| 1 |
|
-module(klsn_rule). |
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
%% public functions |
| 4 |
|
-export([ |
| 5 |
|
validate/2 |
| 6 |
|
, normalize/2 |
| 7 |
|
, eval/3 |
| 8 |
|
, lookup_alias/1 |
| 9 |
|
]). |
| 10 |
|
|
| 11 |
|
%% builtin rules |
| 12 |
|
-export([ |
| 13 |
|
term_rule/3 |
| 14 |
|
, exact_rule/3 |
| 15 |
|
, default_rule/3 |
| 16 |
|
, boolean_rule/3 |
| 17 |
|
, integer_rule/3 |
| 18 |
|
, float_rule/3 |
| 19 |
|
, number_rule/3 |
| 20 |
|
, range_rule/3 |
| 21 |
|
, alias_rule/3 |
| 22 |
|
, with_defs_rule/3 |
| 23 |
|
, ref_rule/3 |
| 24 |
|
, timeout_rule/3 |
| 25 |
|
, binstr_rule/3 |
| 26 |
|
, atom_rule/3 |
| 27 |
|
, enum_rule/3 |
| 28 |
|
, any_of_rule/3 |
| 29 |
|
, all_of_rule/3 |
| 30 |
|
, foldl_rule/3 |
| 31 |
|
, optnl_rule/3 |
| 32 |
|
, nullable_rule/3 |
| 33 |
|
, strict_rule/3 |
| 34 |
|
, list_rule/3 |
| 35 |
|
, tuple_rule/3 |
| 36 |
|
, map_rule/3 |
| 37 |
|
, struct_rule/3 |
| 38 |
|
]). |
| 39 |
|
|
| 40 |
|
-export_type([ |
| 41 |
|
name/0 |
| 42 |
|
, input/0 |
| 43 |
|
, output/0 |
| 44 |
|
, state/0 |
| 45 |
|
, alias/0 |
| 46 |
|
, alias/1 |
| 47 |
|
, alias/2 |
| 48 |
|
, alias_ref/0 |
| 49 |
|
, custom/0 |
| 50 |
|
, rule_param/0 |
| 51 |
|
, rule/0 |
| 52 |
|
, reason/0 |
| 53 |
|
, result/0 |
| 54 |
|
, strict_result/0 |
| 55 |
|
]). |
| 56 |
|
|
| 57 |
|
-type name() :: atom(). |
| 58 |
|
|
| 59 |
|
-type input() :: term(). |
| 60 |
|
|
| 61 |
|
-type output() :: term(). |
| 62 |
|
|
| 63 |
|
-type state() :: #{ |
| 64 |
|
klsn_rule => state_() |
| 65 |
|
, module() => term() |
| 66 |
|
}. |
| 67 |
|
-type state_() :: #{ |
| 68 |
|
definitions => definitions() |
| 69 |
|
}. |
| 70 |
|
|
| 71 |
|
-type ref_key() :: klsn:binstr(). |
| 72 |
|
|
| 73 |
|
-type definitions() :: #{ref_key() => rule()}. |
| 74 |
|
|
| 75 |
|
-type alias() :: atom(). |
| 76 |
|
|
| 77 |
|
%% Just to define a type by using an rule alias. |
| 78 |
|
-type alias(_AliasName) :: term(). |
| 79 |
|
-type alias(_Module, _AliasName) :: term(). |
| 80 |
|
|
| 81 |
|
-type alias_ref() :: {module(), alias()}. |
| 82 |
|
|
| 83 |
|
-type custom() :: fun( (input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result() ). |
| 84 |
|
|
| 85 |
|
-type rule_param() :: term(). |
| 86 |
|
|
| 87 |
|
-type rule() :: {custom, name(), custom(), rule_param()} |
| 88 |
|
| term |
| 89 |
|
| {exact, term()} |
| 90 |
|
| {default, {output(), rule()}} |
| 91 |
|
| boolean |
| 92 |
|
| integer |
| 93 |
|
| float |
| 94 |
|
| number |
| 95 |
|
| {range, range_(rule())} |
| 96 |
|
| {alias, alias_ref()} |
| 97 |
|
| {with_defs, {definitions(), rule()}} |
| 98 |
|
| {ref, ref_key()} |
| 99 |
|
| timeout |
| 100 |
|
| binstr |
| 101 |
|
| atom |
| 102 |
|
| {enum, [atom()]} |
| 103 |
|
| {any_of, [rule()]} |
| 104 |
|
| {all_of, [rule()]} |
| 105 |
|
| {foldl, [rule()]} |
| 106 |
|
| {optnl, rule()} |
| 107 |
|
| {nullable, rule()} |
| 108 |
|
| {strict, rule()} |
| 109 |
|
| {list, rule()} |
| 110 |
|
| {tuple, [rule()] | tuple()} % {rule(), rule(), ...} |
| 111 |
|
| {map, {KeyRule::rule(), ValueRule::rule()}} |
| 112 |
|
| {struct, #{atom() => {required | optional, rule()}}} |
| 113 |
|
. |
| 114 |
|
|
| 115 |
|
-type reason() :: {custom, term()} |
| 116 |
|
| {unknown_rule, rule()} |
| 117 |
|
| {invalid, name(), input()} |
| 118 |
|
| {invalid_exact, term(), input()} |
| 119 |
|
| {invalid_enum, [atom()], input()} |
| 120 |
|
| {invalid_list_element, pos_integer(), reason()} |
| 121 |
|
| {invalid_tuple_size, non_neg_integer(), input()} |
| 122 |
|
| {invalid_tuple_element, pos_integer(), reason()} |
| 123 |
|
| {invalid_optnl_value, reason()} |
| 124 |
|
| {invalid_nullable_value, reason()} |
| 125 |
|
| {invalid_map_key, reason()} |
| 126 |
|
| {invalid_map_value, Key::term(), reason()} |
| 127 |
|
| {map_key_conflict, Key::term()} |
| 128 |
|
| {invalid_alias, alias_ref(), reason()} |
| 129 |
|
| {undefined_alias, alias_ref(), input()} |
| 130 |
|
| {invalid_ref, ref_key(), reason()} |
| 131 |
|
| {undefined_ref, ref_key(), input()} |
| 132 |
|
| {invalid_struct_field, term()} |
| 133 |
|
| {invalid_struct_value, atom(), reason()} |
| 134 |
|
| {missing_required_field, atom()} |
| 135 |
|
| {struct_field_conflict, atom()} |
| 136 |
|
| {any_of, [reason()]} |
| 137 |
|
| {all_of, [reason()]} |
| 138 |
|
| {strict, reason()} |
| 139 |
|
| {invalid_range, range_(input())} |
| 140 |
|
. |
| 141 |
|
|
| 142 |
|
-type result() :: valid |
| 143 |
|
| {valid, output()} |
| 144 |
|
| {normalized, output()} |
| 145 |
|
| {normalized, output(), reason()} |
| 146 |
|
| reject |
| 147 |
|
| {reject, reason()} |
| 148 |
|
. |
| 149 |
|
|
| 150 |
|
-type strict_result() :: {valid, output()} |
| 151 |
|
| {normalized, output(), reason()} |
| 152 |
|
| {reject, reason()} |
| 153 |
|
. |
| 154 |
|
|
| 155 |
|
-type range_(Subject) :: {number(), '<' | '=<', Subject} |
| 156 |
|
| {Subject, '<' | '=<', number()} |
| 157 |
|
| {number(), '<' | '=<', Subject, '<' | '=<', number()} |
| 158 |
|
. |
| 159 |
|
|
| 160 |
|
%% @doc |
| 161 |
|
%% Lookup a named rule alias declared via -klsn_rule_alias in a module. |
| 162 |
|
%% |
| 163 |
|
%% Returns {value, Rule} when found, otherwise none. |
| 164 |
|
%% |
| 165 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 166 |
|
%% ``` |
| 167 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:lookup_alias({my_mod, my_alias}). |
| 168 |
|
%% {value, integer} |
| 169 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:lookup_alias({my_mod, missing}). |
| 170 |
|
%% none |
| 171 |
|
%% ''' |
| 172 |
|
-spec lookup_alias(alias_ref()) -> klsn:optnl(rule()). |
| 173 |
|
lookup_alias({Module, Alias}) when is_atom(Module), is_atom(Alias) -> |
| 174 |
618277 |
try Module:module_info(attributes) of |
| 175 |
|
Attrs -> |
| 176 |
618276 |
AliasRules0 = proplists:lookup_all(klsn_rule_alias, Attrs), |
| 177 |
618276 |
AliasRules1 = lists:map(fun |
| 178 |
|
({_, RuleEntries}) when is_list(RuleEntries) -> |
| 179 |
1236567 |
RuleEntries; |
| 180 |
|
({_, RuleEntry}) -> |
| 181 |
:-( |
[RuleEntry] |
| 182 |
|
end, AliasRules0), |
| 183 |
618276 |
AliasRules = lists:concat(AliasRules1), |
| 184 |
618276 |
case lists:search(fun |
| 185 |
|
({RuleName0, _Rule0}) when RuleName0 =:= Alias -> |
| 186 |
618275 |
true; |
| 187 |
|
(_) -> |
| 188 |
5839842 |
false |
| 189 |
|
end, AliasRules) of |
| 190 |
|
{value, {_, RuleValue}} -> |
| 191 |
618275 |
{value, RuleValue}; |
| 192 |
|
false -> |
| 193 |
1 |
none |
| 194 |
|
end |
| 195 |
|
catch _:_ -> |
| 196 |
1 |
none |
| 197 |
|
end; |
| 198 |
|
lookup_alias(_Arg1) -> |
| 199 |
1 |
none. |
| 200 |
|
|
| 201 |
|
%% @doc |
| 202 |
|
%% Validate an input against a rule. |
| 203 |
|
%% |
| 204 |
|
%% This calls {@link eval/3} and only accepts a `{valid, Output}' |
| 205 |
|
%% result. Any normalized or reject result raises |
| 206 |
|
%% `error({klsn_rule, Reason})'. |
| 207 |
|
%% |
| 208 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 209 |
|
%% ``` |
| 210 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:validate(10, integer). |
| 211 |
|
%% ok |
| 212 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:validate(<<"10">>, integer). |
| 213 |
|
%% ** exception error: {klsn_rule,{invalid,integer,<<"10">>}} |
| 214 |
|
%% ''' |
| 215 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 216 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 217 |
|
-spec validate(input(), rule()) -> ok. |
| 218 |
|
validate(Input, Rule) -> |
| 219 |
3 |
case eval(Input, Rule, #{}) of |
| 220 |
|
{valid, _} -> |
| 221 |
1 |
ok; |
| 222 |
|
{normalized, _, Reason} -> |
| 223 |
1 |
error({?MODULE, Reason}); |
| 224 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 225 |
1 |
error({?MODULE, Reason}) |
| 226 |
|
end. |
| 227 |
|
|
| 228 |
|
%% @doc |
| 229 |
|
%% Normalize an input according to a rule. |
| 230 |
|
%% |
| 231 |
|
%% This calls {@link eval/3}. Valid and normalized results return the output, |
| 232 |
|
%% while reject results raise `error({klsn_rule, Reason})'. |
| 233 |
|
%% Normalization reasons are dropped; use {@link eval/3} if you need them. |
| 234 |
|
%% |
| 235 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 236 |
|
%% ``` |
| 237 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:normalize(<<"10">>, integer). |
| 238 |
|
%% 10 |
| 239 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:normalize(5, {range, {0, '=<', integer, '<', 10}}). |
| 240 |
|
%% 5 |
| 241 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize(99, {range, {0, '=<', integer, '<', 10}}). |
| 242 |
|
%% ** exception error: {klsn_rule,{invalid_range,{0,'=<',99,'<',10}}} |
| 243 |
|
%% ''' |
| 244 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 245 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 246 |
|
-spec normalize(input(), rule()) -> output(). |
| 247 |
|
normalize(Input, Rule) -> |
| 248 |
6 |
case eval(Input, Rule, #{}) of |
| 249 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 250 |
2 |
Output; |
| 251 |
|
{normalized, Output, _Reason} -> |
| 252 |
3 |
Output; |
| 253 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 254 |
1 |
error({?MODULE, Reason}) |
| 255 |
|
end. |
| 256 |
|
|
| 257 |
|
%% @doc |
| 258 |
|
%% Accept any input and always return valid for validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 259 |
|
%% Rule form: term (rule()). |
| 260 |
|
%% |
| 261 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 262 |
|
%% - valid with the input unchanged. |
| 263 |
|
%% - never normalized (no reason()). |
| 264 |
|
%% - never rejected (no reason()). |
| 265 |
|
%% |
| 266 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 267 |
|
%% ``` |
| 268 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:validate({any, value}, term). |
| 269 |
|
%% ok |
| 270 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:normalize(123, term). |
| 271 |
|
%% 123 |
| 272 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval([a, b], term, #{}). |
| 273 |
|
%% {valid, [a, b]} |
| 274 |
|
%% ''' |
| 275 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 276 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 277 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 278 |
|
-spec term_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 279 |
|
term_rule(_Input, _Param, _State) -> |
| 280 |
26296 |
valid. |
| 281 |
|
|
| 282 |
|
%% @doc |
| 283 |
|
%% Match an input against the exact rule parameter value. |
| 284 |
|
%% |
| 285 |
|
%% Rule form: {exact, Exact}. |
| 286 |
|
%% |
| 287 |
|
%% When evaluated via {@link eval/3}: |
| 288 |
|
%% - valid: {valid, Input} when Input =:= Exact |
| 289 |
|
%% - reject: {reject, {invalid_exact, Exact, Input}} |
| 290 |
|
%% |
| 291 |
|
%% This rule never produces a normalized result. {@link normalize/2} either |
| 292 |
|
%% returns the original input or raises with {klsn_rule, {invalid_exact, Exact, Input}}. |
| 293 |
|
%% |
| 294 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 295 |
|
%% ``` |
| 296 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(42, {exact, 42}, #{}). |
| 297 |
|
%% {valid, 42} |
| 298 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(7, {exact, 42}, #{}). |
| 299 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid_exact, 42, 7}} |
| 300 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize(ok, {exact, ok}). |
| 301 |
|
%% ok |
| 302 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:normalize(error, {exact, ok}). |
| 303 |
|
%% ** exception error: {klsn_rule,{invalid_exact,ok,error}} |
| 304 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:validate(ok, {exact, ok}). |
| 305 |
|
%% ok |
| 306 |
|
%% ''' |
| 307 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 308 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 309 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 310 |
|
-spec exact_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 311 |
|
exact_rule(Input, Exact, _State) -> |
| 312 |
96112 |
case Input =:= Exact of |
| 313 |
|
true -> |
| 314 |
1080 |
valid; |
| 315 |
|
false -> |
| 316 |
95032 |
{reject, {invalid_exact, Exact, Input}} |
| 317 |
|
end. |
| 318 |
|
|
| 319 |
|
%% @doc |
| 320 |
|
%% Apply Rule and fall back to Default when it rejects. |
| 321 |
|
%% |
| 322 |
|
%% Rule form: {default, {Default, Rule}} where Default is output() and |
| 323 |
|
%% Rule is rule(). |
| 324 |
|
%% |
| 325 |
|
%% When evaluated via {@link eval/3}: |
| 326 |
|
%% - valid: {valid, Output} when Rule returns {valid, Output}. |
| 327 |
|
%% - normalized: {normalized, Output, Reason} when Rule returns |
| 328 |
|
%% {normalized, Output, Reason}. |
| 329 |
|
%% - normalized: {normalized, Default, Reason} when Rule returns |
| 330 |
|
%% {reject, Reason}. |
| 331 |
|
%% - reject: {reject, {invalid, default, Input}} when the rule parameter is not |
| 332 |
|
%% {Default, Rule}. |
| 333 |
|
%% |
| 334 |
|
%% Reason handling: |
| 335 |
|
%% - Reasons are passed through from Rule (including {unknown_rule, Rule}). |
| 336 |
|
%% - If Rule normalizes without a reason, {@link eval/3} uses |
| 337 |
|
%% {invalid, RuleName, Input} where RuleName is the inner rule name. |
| 338 |
|
%% - {@link normalize/2} returns Output or Default and drops the reason. |
| 339 |
|
%% - {@link validate/2} raises error({klsn_rule, Reason}) on normalized or |
| 340 |
|
%% reject results. |
| 341 |
|
%% |
| 342 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 343 |
|
%% ``` |
| 344 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(ok, {default, {ok, {exact, ok}}}, #{}). |
| 345 |
|
%% {valid, ok} |
| 346 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(error, {default, {ok, {exact, ok}}}, #{}). |
| 347 |
|
%% {normalized, ok, {invalid_exact, ok, error}} |
| 348 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize(1, {default, {0, {exact, 0}}}). |
| 349 |
|
%% 0 |
| 350 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:validate(1, {default, {0, {exact, 0}}}). |
| 351 |
|
%% ** exception error: {klsn_rule,{invalid_exact,0,1}} |
| 352 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:eval(1, {default, []}, #{}). |
| 353 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid, default, 1}} |
| 354 |
|
%% ''' |
| 355 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 356 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 357 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 358 |
|
-spec default_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 359 |
|
default_rule(Input, {Default, Rule}, State) -> |
| 360 |
8 |
case eval(Input, Rule, State) of |
| 361 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 362 |
1 |
{valid, Output}; |
| 363 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 364 |
2 |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 365 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 366 |
5 |
{normalized, Default, Reason} |
| 367 |
|
end; |
| 368 |
|
default_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 369 |
:-( |
reject. |
| 370 |
|
|
| 371 |
|
%% @doc |
| 372 |
|
%% Normalize booleans from common boolean-like inputs. |
| 373 |
|
%% |
| 374 |
|
%% Rule form: boolean. |
| 375 |
|
%% |
| 376 |
|
%% Accepted as-is: true and false. |
| 377 |
|
%% Otherwise, values are coerced by: |
| 378 |
|
%% - returning false for numbers with `-1 < N < 1'; |
| 379 |
|
%% - converting via klsn_binstr:from_any/1 and treating |
| 380 |
|
%% `<<>>', "false"/"False"/"FALSE", "null"/"Null"/"NULL", the |
| 381 |
|
%% lowercase "undefined", and the Unicode fullwidth zero (U+FF10) |
| 382 |
|
%% as false; everything else is true. |
| 383 |
|
%% |
| 384 |
|
%% When evaluated via {@link eval/3}: |
| 385 |
|
%% - valid: {valid, Input} when Input is boolean |
| 386 |
|
%% - normalized: {normalized, Bool, {invalid, boolean, Input}} when coerced |
| 387 |
|
%% - reject: {reject, {invalid, boolean, Input}} when not coercible |
| 388 |
|
%% |
| 389 |
|
%% validate/2 only accepts literal booleans; any coercion or reject |
| 390 |
|
%% yields error({klsn_rule, {invalid, boolean, Input}}). Use |
| 391 |
|
%% normalize/2 to allow coercion. |
| 392 |
|
%% |
| 393 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 394 |
|
%% ``` |
| 395 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(true, boolean, #{}). |
| 396 |
|
%% {valid, true} |
| 397 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(<<"false">>, boolean, #{}). |
| 398 |
|
%% {normalized, false, {invalid, boolean, <<"false">>}} |
| 399 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize(0, boolean). |
| 400 |
|
%% false |
| 401 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval(<<"0">>, boolean, #{}). |
| 402 |
|
%% {normalized, true, {invalid, boolean, <<"0">>}} |
| 403 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:eval(#{}, boolean, #{}). |
| 404 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid, boolean, #{}}} |
| 405 |
|
%% 6> klsn_rule:validate(<<"false">>, boolean). |
| 406 |
|
%% ** exception error: {klsn_rule,{invalid,boolean,<<"false">>}} |
| 407 |
|
%% ''' |
| 408 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 409 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 410 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 411 |
|
-spec boolean_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 412 |
|
boolean_rule(Input, _Param, _State) -> |
| 413 |
7189 |
do( |
| 414 |
|
fun is_boolean/1 |
| 415 |
|
, [fun |
| 416 |
|
(I) when -1 < I, I < 1 -> |
| 417 |
331 |
false; |
| 418 |
|
(I) -> |
| 419 |
4674 |
case klsn_binstr:from_any(I) of |
| 420 |
3827 |
<<>> -> false; |
| 421 |
1 |
<<"false">> -> false; |
| 422 |
1 |
<<"False">> -> false; |
| 423 |
1 |
<<"FALSE">> -> false; |
| 424 |
1 |
<<"0"/utf8>> -> false; |
| 425 |
1 |
<<"null">> -> false; |
| 426 |
1 |
<<"Null">> -> false; |
| 427 |
1 |
<<"NULL">> -> false; |
| 428 |
1 |
<<"undefined">> -> false; |
| 429 |
257 |
_ -> true |
| 430 |
|
end |
| 431 |
|
end] |
| 432 |
|
, Input |
| 433 |
|
) . |
| 434 |
|
|
| 435 |
|
%% @doc |
| 436 |
|
%% Validate integer input for use with validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 437 |
|
%% Rule form: integer. |
| 438 |
|
%% |
| 439 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 440 |
|
%% - valid when Input is an integer. |
| 441 |
|
%% - normalized when Input is a list or binary that parses via |
| 442 |
|
%% binary_to_integer/1 or list_to_integer/1. |
| 443 |
|
%% - reject when Input is neither an integer nor a parseable list/binary. |
| 444 |
|
%% |
| 445 |
|
%% Reason (eval/3): |
| 446 |
|
%% - {invalid, integer, Input} on normalize and reject. |
| 447 |
|
%% validate/2 raises error({klsn_rule, {invalid, integer, Input}}) when |
| 448 |
|
%% normalization or rejection occurs. |
| 449 |
|
%% |
| 450 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 451 |
|
%% ``` |
| 452 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(10, integer, #{}). |
| 453 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval("10", integer, #{}). |
| 454 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize("10", integer). |
| 455 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval("nope", integer, #{}). |
| 456 |
|
%% ''' |
| 457 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 458 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 459 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 460 |
|
-spec integer_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 461 |
|
integer_rule(Input, _Param, _State) -> |
| 462 |
128 |
do( |
| 463 |
|
fun is_integer/1 |
| 464 |
|
, [fun binary_to_integer/1, fun list_to_integer/1] |
| 465 |
|
, Input |
| 466 |
|
) . |
| 467 |
|
|
| 468 |
|
%% @doc |
| 469 |
|
%% Validate float input for validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 470 |
|
%% Rule form: float. |
| 471 |
|
%% |
| 472 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 473 |
|
%% - valid when Input is a float. |
| 474 |
|
%% - normalized when Input is a binary or list that parses via binary_to_float/1 |
| 475 |
|
%% or list_to_float/1; reason is {invalid, float, Input}. |
| 476 |
|
%% - reject when Input cannot be converted; reason is {invalid, float, Input}. |
| 477 |
|
%% |
| 478 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the float output (original or parsed) and drops the reason. |
| 479 |
|
%% validate/2 accepts only valid results; normalized or reject raise |
| 480 |
|
%% error({klsn_rule, {invalid, float, Input}}). |
| 481 |
|
%% |
| 482 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 483 |
|
%% ``` |
| 484 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(1.25, float, #{}). |
| 485 |
|
%% {valid, 1.25} |
| 486 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(<<"1.25">>, float, #{}). |
| 487 |
|
%% {normalized, 1.25, {invalid, float, <<"1.25">>}} |
| 488 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize("1.25", float). |
| 489 |
|
%% 1.25 |
| 490 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval(<<"nope">>, float, #{}). |
| 491 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid, float, <<"nope">>}} |
| 492 |
|
%% ''' |
| 493 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 494 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 495 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 496 |
|
-spec float_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 497 |
|
float_rule(Input, _Param, _State) -> |
| 498 |
15 |
do( |
| 499 |
|
fun is_float/1 |
| 500 |
|
, [fun binary_to_float/1, fun list_to_float/1] |
| 501 |
|
, Input |
| 502 |
|
) . |
| 503 |
|
|
| 504 |
|
%% @doc |
| 505 |
|
%% Validate numeric input for validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 506 |
|
%% Rule form: number (or {number, Param}; Param is ignored). |
| 507 |
|
%% |
| 508 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 509 |
|
%% - valid when Input is a number (integer or float). |
| 510 |
|
%% - normalized when Input is a binary or list that parses as an integer/float; |
| 511 |
|
%% parsing order is binary_to_integer/1, binary_to_float/1, |
| 512 |
|
%% list_to_integer/1, list_to_float/1. |
| 513 |
|
%% - reject when Input is not numeric and cannot be parsed. |
| 514 |
|
%% |
| 515 |
|
%% Reason (eval/3): |
| 516 |
|
%% - {invalid, number, Input} on normalize or reject. |
| 517 |
|
%% |
| 518 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the parsed number (or original) or raises with |
| 519 |
|
%% {klsn_rule, {invalid, number, Input}}. validate/2 returns ok only for |
| 520 |
|
%% already-numeric input and raises for normalized/reject results. |
| 521 |
|
%% |
| 522 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 523 |
|
%% ``` |
| 524 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(10, number, #{}). |
| 525 |
|
%% {valid, 10} |
| 526 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(<<"10">>, number, #{}). |
| 527 |
|
%% {normalized, 10, {invalid, number, <<"10">>}} |
| 528 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize("1.5", number). |
| 529 |
|
%% 1.5 |
| 530 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval(<<"nope">>, number, #{}). |
| 531 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid, number, <<"nope">>}} |
| 532 |
|
%% ''' |
| 533 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 534 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 535 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 536 |
|
-spec number_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 537 |
|
number_rule(Input, _Param, _State) -> |
| 538 |
4713 |
do( |
| 539 |
|
fun is_number/1 |
| 540 |
|
, [ |
| 541 |
|
fun binary_to_integer/1 |
| 542 |
|
, fun binary_to_float/1 |
| 543 |
|
, fun list_to_integer/1 |
| 544 |
|
, fun list_to_float/1 |
| 545 |
|
] |
| 546 |
|
, Input |
| 547 |
|
) . |
| 548 |
|
|
| 549 |
|
%% @doc |
| 550 |
|
%% Validate a range rule used by validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 551 |
|
%% Rule form: {range, range_(Rule)} where Rule is rule() and range_(Rule) |
| 552 |
|
%% is one of: |
| 553 |
|
%% {Rule, Op, Upper} | {Lower, Op, Rule} | {Lower, Op1, Rule, Op2, Upper} |
| 554 |
|
%% Op/Op1/Op2 are `` '<' '' or `` '=<' ''. Lower/Upper are numbers. |
| 555 |
|
%% |
| 556 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 557 |
|
%% - valid when Rule validates and the output satisfies the bound(s). |
| 558 |
|
%% - normalized with the same Reason when Rule normalizes and the output |
| 559 |
|
%% satisfies the bound(s). |
| 560 |
|
%% - reject with {invalid_range, RangeOutput} when the bound check fails. |
| 561 |
|
%% - reject with the underlying Reason when Rule rejects. |
| 562 |
|
%% |
| 563 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns Output for valid/normalized results and raises with |
| 564 |
|
%% {klsn_rule, Reason} on reject. validate/2 returns ok only for valid results. |
| 565 |
|
%% |
| 566 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 567 |
|
%% ``` |
| 568 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(<<"10">>, {range, {integer, '=<', 10}}, #{}). |
| 569 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(5, {range, {0, '=<', integer, '<', 10}}, #{}). |
| 570 |
|
%% ''' |
| 571 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 572 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 573 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 574 |
|
-spec range_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 575 |
|
range_rule(Input, {Subject, Op, Upper}, State) |
| 576 |
|
when (Op =:= '<' orelse Op =:= '=<'), |
| 577 |
|
is_number(Upper), |
| 578 |
|
is_number(Subject) =:= false -> |
| 579 |
7 |
case eval(Input, Subject, State) of |
| 580 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 581 |
4 |
case Op of |
| 582 |
|
'<' when Output < Upper -> |
| 583 |
:-( |
valid; |
| 584 |
|
'=<' when Output =< Upper -> |
| 585 |
2 |
valid; |
| 586 |
|
_ -> |
| 587 |
2 |
{reject, {invalid_range, {Output, Op, Upper}}} |
| 588 |
|
end; |
| 589 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 590 |
2 |
case Op of |
| 591 |
|
'<' when Output < Upper -> |
| 592 |
:-( |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 593 |
|
'=<' when Output =< Upper -> |
| 594 |
2 |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 595 |
|
_ -> |
| 596 |
:-( |
{reject, {invalid_range, {Output, Op, Upper}}} |
| 597 |
|
end; |
| 598 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 599 |
1 |
{reject, Reason} |
| 600 |
|
end; |
| 601 |
|
range_rule(Input, {Lower, Op, Subject}, State) |
| 602 |
|
when (Op =:= '<' orelse Op =:= '=<'), |
| 603 |
|
is_number(Lower), |
| 604 |
|
is_number(Subject) =:= false -> |
| 605 |
9 |
case eval(Input, Subject, State) of |
| 606 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 607 |
4 |
case Op of |
| 608 |
|
'<' when Lower < Output -> |
| 609 |
1 |
valid; |
| 610 |
|
'=<' when Lower =< Output -> |
| 611 |
1 |
valid; |
| 612 |
|
_ -> |
| 613 |
2 |
{reject, {invalid_range, {Lower, Op, Output}}} |
| 614 |
|
end; |
| 615 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 616 |
2 |
case Op of |
| 617 |
|
'<' when Lower < Output -> |
| 618 |
:-( |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 619 |
|
'=<' when Lower =< Output -> |
| 620 |
:-( |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 621 |
|
_ -> |
| 622 |
2 |
{reject, {invalid_range, {Lower, Op, Output}}} |
| 623 |
|
end; |
| 624 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 625 |
3 |
{reject, Reason} |
| 626 |
|
end; |
| 627 |
|
range_rule(Input, {Lower, Op1, Subject, Op2, Upper}, State) |
| 628 |
|
when (Op1 =:= '<' orelse Op1 =:= '=<'), |
| 629 |
|
(Op2 =:= '<' orelse Op2 =:= '=<'), |
| 630 |
|
is_number(Lower), |
| 631 |
|
is_number(Upper), |
| 632 |
|
is_number(Subject) =:= false -> |
| 633 |
4 |
case eval(Input, Subject, State) of |
| 634 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 635 |
4 |
LowerOk = case Op1 of |
| 636 |
|
'<' when Lower < Output -> |
| 637 |
:-( |
true; |
| 638 |
|
'=<' when Lower =< Output -> |
| 639 |
3 |
true; |
| 640 |
|
_ -> |
| 641 |
1 |
false |
| 642 |
|
end, |
| 643 |
4 |
UpperOk = case Op2 of |
| 644 |
|
'<' when Output < Upper -> |
| 645 |
:-( |
true; |
| 646 |
|
'=<' when Output =< Upper -> |
| 647 |
3 |
true; |
| 648 |
|
_ -> |
| 649 |
1 |
false |
| 650 |
|
end, |
| 651 |
4 |
case LowerOk andalso UpperOk of |
| 652 |
|
true -> |
| 653 |
2 |
valid; |
| 654 |
|
false -> |
| 655 |
2 |
{reject, {invalid_range, {Lower, Op1, Output, Op2, Upper}}} |
| 656 |
|
end; |
| 657 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 658 |
:-( |
LowerOk = case Op1 of |
| 659 |
|
'<' when Lower < Output -> |
| 660 |
:-( |
true; |
| 661 |
|
'=<' when Lower =< Output -> |
| 662 |
:-( |
true; |
| 663 |
|
_ -> |
| 664 |
:-( |
false |
| 665 |
|
end, |
| 666 |
:-( |
UpperOk = case Op2 of |
| 667 |
|
'<' when Output < Upper -> |
| 668 |
:-( |
true; |
| 669 |
|
'=<' when Output =< Upper -> |
| 670 |
:-( |
true; |
| 671 |
|
_ -> |
| 672 |
:-( |
false |
| 673 |
|
end, |
| 674 |
:-( |
case LowerOk andalso UpperOk of |
| 675 |
|
true -> |
| 676 |
:-( |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 677 |
|
false -> |
| 678 |
:-( |
{reject, {invalid_range, {Lower, Op1, Output, Op2, Upper}}} |
| 679 |
|
end; |
| 680 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 681 |
:-( |
{reject, Reason} |
| 682 |
|
end; |
| 683 |
|
range_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 684 |
2 |
reject. |
| 685 |
|
|
| 686 |
|
%% @doc |
| 687 |
|
%% Resolve and evaluate a named rule alias declared via -klsn_rule_alias. |
| 688 |
|
%% |
| 689 |
|
%% Rule form: {alias, AliasRef} where AliasRef is {Module, Alias}. |
| 690 |
|
%% |
| 691 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 692 |
|
%% - valid when the named rule validates. |
| 693 |
|
%% - normalized when the named rule normalizes; reason is |
| 694 |
|
%% {invalid_alias, AliasRef, Reason}. |
| 695 |
|
%% - reject when the named rule rejects; reason is |
| 696 |
|
%% {invalid_alias, AliasRef, Reason}. |
| 697 |
|
%% - reject with {undefined_alias, AliasRef, Input} when missing. |
| 698 |
|
%% - reject with {invalid, alias, Input} when AliasRef is malformed. |
| 699 |
|
%% |
| 700 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 701 |
|
%% ``` |
| 702 |
|
%% 1> MyAlias = {my_mod, my_alias}. |
| 703 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(42, {alias, MyAlias}, #{}). |
| 704 |
|
%% {valid, 42} |
| 705 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(<<"42">>, {alias, MyAlias}, #{}). |
| 706 |
|
%% {normalized, 42, {invalid_alias, MyAlias, {invalid, integer, <<"42">>}}} |
| 707 |
|
%% ''' |
| 708 |
|
%% @see lookup_alias/1 |
| 709 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 710 |
|
-spec alias_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 711 |
|
alias_rule(Input, {Module, Alias}=AliasRef, State) |
| 712 |
|
when is_atom(Module), is_atom(Alias) -> |
| 713 |
618271 |
alias_rule_eval_(Input, AliasRef, State); |
| 714 |
|
alias_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 715 |
1 |
reject. |
| 716 |
|
|
| 717 |
|
-spec alias_rule_eval_(input(), alias_ref(), state()) -> result(). |
| 718 |
|
alias_rule_eval_(Input, AliasRef, State) -> |
| 719 |
618271 |
case lookup_alias(AliasRef) of |
| 720 |
|
{value, Rule} -> |
| 721 |
618270 |
case eval(Input, Rule, State) of |
| 722 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 723 |
96949 |
{valid, Output}; |
| 724 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 725 |
41118 |
{normalized, Output, {invalid_alias, AliasRef, Reason}}; |
| 726 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 727 |
480203 |
{reject, {invalid_alias, AliasRef, Reason}} |
| 728 |
|
end; |
| 729 |
|
none -> |
| 730 |
1 |
{reject, {undefined_alias, AliasRef, Input}} |
| 731 |
|
end. |
| 732 |
|
|
| 733 |
|
%% @doc |
| 734 |
|
%% Evaluate a rule with a definitions map stored in the evaluation state. |
| 735 |
|
%% |
| 736 |
|
%% Rule form: {with_defs, {Definitions, Rule}} where Definitions is a map of |
| 737 |
|
%% reference name to rule(). |
| 738 |
|
%% |
| 739 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 740 |
|
%% - valid/normalized/reject according to Rule evaluated with the updated state. |
| 741 |
|
%% |
| 742 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 743 |
|
%% ``` |
| 744 |
|
%% 1> Defs = #{<<"n">> => integer}. |
| 745 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(1, {with_defs, {Defs, {ref, <<"n">>}}}, #{}). |
| 746 |
|
%% {valid, 1} |
| 747 |
|
%% ''' |
| 748 |
|
%% @see ref_rule/3 |
| 749 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 750 |
|
-spec with_defs_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 751 |
|
with_defs_rule(Input, {Defs, Rule}, State) when is_map(Defs) -> |
| 752 |
5 |
Defs0 = klsn_map:get([?MODULE, definitions], State, #{}), |
| 753 |
5 |
State1 = klsn_map:upsert([?MODULE, definitions], maps:merge(Defs0, Defs), State), |
| 754 |
5 |
eval(Input, Rule, State1); |
| 755 |
|
with_defs_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 756 |
:-( |
reject. |
| 757 |
|
|
| 758 |
|
%% @doc |
| 759 |
|
%% Resolve and evaluate a rule from the current definition set. |
| 760 |
|
%% |
| 761 |
|
%% Rule form: {ref, RefName} where RefName is a binary name that maps to a rule |
| 762 |
|
%% stored by {@link with_defs_rule/3}. |
| 763 |
|
%% |
| 764 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 765 |
|
%% - valid when the referenced rule validates. |
| 766 |
|
%% - normalized when the referenced rule normalizes; reason is |
| 767 |
|
%% {invalid_ref, RefName, Reason}. |
| 768 |
|
%% - reject when the referenced rule rejects; reason is |
| 769 |
|
%% {invalid_ref, RefName, Reason}. |
| 770 |
|
%% - reject with {undefined_ref, RefName, Input} when missing. |
| 771 |
|
%% |
| 772 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 773 |
|
%% ``` |
| 774 |
|
%% 1> Defs = #{<<"n">> => integer}. |
| 775 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(<<"1">>, {with_defs, {Defs, {ref, <<"n">>}}}, #{}). |
| 776 |
|
%% {normalized, 1, {invalid_ref, <<"n">>, {invalid, integer, <<"1">>}}} |
| 777 |
|
%% ''' |
| 778 |
|
%% @see with_defs_rule/3 |
| 779 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 780 |
|
-spec ref_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 781 |
|
ref_rule(Input, Ref, State) -> |
| 782 |
8 |
case klsn_map:lookup([?MODULE, definitions, Ref], State) of |
| 783 |
|
{value, Rule} -> |
| 784 |
7 |
case eval(Input, Rule, State) of |
| 785 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 786 |
6 |
{valid, Output}; |
| 787 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 788 |
1 |
{normalized, Output, {invalid_ref, Ref, Reason}}; |
| 789 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 790 |
:-( |
{reject, {invalid_ref, Ref, Reason}} |
| 791 |
|
end; |
| 792 |
|
none -> |
| 793 |
1 |
{reject, {undefined_ref, Ref, Input}} |
| 794 |
|
end. |
| 795 |
|
|
| 796 |
|
%% @doc |
| 797 |
|
%% Validate timeout input for validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 798 |
|
%% Rule form: timeout. |
| 799 |
|
%% |
| 800 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 801 |
|
%% - valid when Input is infinity or a non-negative integer. |
| 802 |
|
%% - normalized when Input is a list/binary that parses via |
| 803 |
|
%% binary_to_integer/1 or list_to_integer/1, or the string "infinity". |
| 804 |
|
%% - reject when Input cannot be converted. |
| 805 |
|
%% |
| 806 |
|
%% Reason (eval/3): |
| 807 |
|
%% - {invalid, timeout, Input} on normalize or reject. |
| 808 |
|
%% |
| 809 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the converted timeout (or original) or raises with |
| 810 |
|
%% {klsn_rule, {invalid, timeout, Input}}. validate/2 returns ok only when the |
| 811 |
|
%% input is already valid and raises on normalization or reject. |
| 812 |
|
%% |
| 813 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 814 |
|
%% ``` |
| 815 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(infinity, timeout, #{}). |
| 816 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(0, timeout, #{}). |
| 817 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(<<"15">>, timeout, #{}). |
| 818 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:normalize("15", timeout). |
| 819 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:eval(foo, timeout, #{}). |
| 820 |
|
%% ''' |
| 821 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 822 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 823 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 824 |
|
-spec timeout_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 825 |
|
timeout_rule(Input, _Param, State) -> |
| 826 |
8 |
Rule = {any_of, [{enum, [infinity]}, {range, {0, '=<', integer}}]}, |
| 827 |
8 |
case eval(Input, Rule, State) of |
| 828 |
|
{valid, _Output} -> |
| 829 |
2 |
valid; |
| 830 |
|
{normalized, Output, _Reason} -> |
| 831 |
2 |
{normalized, Output}; |
| 832 |
|
{reject, _Reason} -> |
| 833 |
4 |
reject |
| 834 |
|
end. |
| 835 |
|
|
| 836 |
|
%% @doc |
| 837 |
|
%% Validate binary strings used by validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 838 |
|
%% Rule form: binstr. |
| 839 |
|
%% |
| 840 |
|
%% Accepts binaries as-is (klsn:binstr()); otherwise converts integers, |
| 841 |
|
%% floats, atoms, and iolists via klsn_binstr:from_any/1. |
| 842 |
|
%% |
| 843 |
|
%% Result: |
| 844 |
|
%% - valid when Input is already a binary. |
| 845 |
|
%% - normalized when Input converts to a binary; reason is {invalid, binstr, Input}. |
| 846 |
|
%% - reject when conversion fails; reason is {invalid, binstr, Input}. |
| 847 |
|
%% |
| 848 |
|
%% {@link normalize/2} returns the binary (original or converted) or raises |
| 849 |
|
%% error({klsn_rule, {invalid, binstr, Input}}). {@link validate/2} returns |
| 850 |
|
%% ok only when the input is already a binary, otherwise it raises with |
| 851 |
|
%% the same reason. |
| 852 |
|
%% |
| 853 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 854 |
|
%% ``` |
| 855 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(<<"ok">>, binstr, #{}). |
| 856 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(42, binstr, #{}). |
| 857 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize([<<"a">>, "b"], binstr). |
| 858 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval(#{}, binstr, #{}). |
| 859 |
|
%% ''' |
| 860 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 861 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 862 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 863 |
|
-spec binstr_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 864 |
|
binstr_rule(Input, _Param, _State) -> |
| 865 |
65632 |
do( |
| 866 |
|
[fun klsn_binstr:from_any/1] |
| 867 |
|
, Input |
| 868 |
|
) . |
| 869 |
|
|
| 870 |
|
%% @doc |
| 871 |
|
%% Validate atoms used by validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 872 |
|
%% Rule form: atom. |
| 873 |
|
%% Accepts atoms; otherwise converts input via klsn_binstr:from_any/1 and |
| 874 |
|
%% binary_to_existing_atom/1 (existing atoms only). |
| 875 |
|
%% |
| 876 |
|
%% Result: |
| 877 |
|
%% - valid when Input is an atom. |
| 878 |
|
%% - normalized when Input converts to an existing atom; |
| 879 |
|
%% reason is {invalid, atom, Input}. |
| 880 |
|
%% - reject when Input cannot be converted to an existing atom; |
| 881 |
|
%% reason is {invalid, atom, Input}. |
| 882 |
|
%% |
| 883 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 884 |
|
%% ``` |
| 885 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:validate(ok, atom). |
| 886 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:normalize(<<"ok">>, atom). |
| 887 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(<<"not_an_atom">>, atom, #{}). |
| 888 |
|
%% ''' |
| 889 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 890 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 891 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 892 |
|
-spec atom_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 893 |
|
atom_rule(Input, _Param, _State) -> |
| 894 |
15 |
do( |
| 895 |
|
fun is_atom/1 |
| 896 |
|
, [fun(I) -> |
| 897 |
6 |
binary_to_existing_atom(klsn_binstr:from_any(I)) |
| 898 |
|
end] |
| 899 |
|
, Input |
| 900 |
|
) . |
| 901 |
|
|
| 902 |
|
%% @doc |
| 903 |
|
%% Validate enums used by validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 904 |
|
%% Rule form: {enum, [atom()]}. |
| 905 |
|
%% Matching compares klsn_binstr:from_any/1 for the input and each allowed enum. |
| 906 |
|
%% Exact =:= matches are valid; otherwise the input normalizes to the matched enum. |
| 907 |
|
%% |
| 908 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 909 |
|
%% - valid when Input matches an allowed enum exactly (Input =:= Enum). |
| 910 |
|
%% - normalized when Input matches by binary conversion but is not =:=; |
| 911 |
|
%% reason is {invalid, enum, Input}. |
| 912 |
|
%% - reject when no allowed enum matches; reason is {invalid_enum, AllowedEnums, Input}. |
| 913 |
|
%% - reject when AllowedEnums is not a list; reason is {invalid, enum, Input}. |
| 914 |
|
%% |
| 915 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the matched enum and discards the reason; use eval/3 to |
| 916 |
|
%% inspect the normalization reason. |
| 917 |
|
%% |
| 918 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 919 |
|
%% ``` |
| 920 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(foo, {enum, [foo, bar]}, #{}). |
| 921 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(<<"foo">>, {enum, [foo, bar]}, #{}). |
| 922 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(baz, {enum, [foo, bar]}, #{}). |
| 923 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:normalize(<<"bar">>, {enum, [foo, bar]}). |
| 924 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:validate(baz, {enum, [foo, bar]}). |
| 925 |
|
%% ''' |
| 926 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 927 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 928 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 929 |
|
-spec enum_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 930 |
|
enum_rule(Input, AllowedEnums, _State) when is_list(AllowedEnums) -> |
| 931 |
160633 |
InputBinary = try klsn_binstr:from_any(Input) catch |
| 932 |
|
_:_ -> |
| 933 |
6 |
error |
| 934 |
|
end, |
| 935 |
160633 |
MaybeEnum = lists:search(fun(E) -> |
| 936 |
191159 |
try |
| 937 |
191159 |
InputBinary =:= klsn_binstr:from_any(E) |
| 938 |
|
catch _:_ -> |
| 939 |
1 |
false |
| 940 |
|
end |
| 941 |
|
end, AllowedEnums), |
| 942 |
160633 |
case MaybeEnum of |
| 943 |
|
{value, Enum} when Input =:= Enum -> |
| 944 |
22139 |
valid; |
| 945 |
|
{value, Enum} -> |
| 946 |
11593 |
{normalized, Enum}; |
| 947 |
|
_ -> |
| 948 |
126901 |
{reject, {invalid_enum, AllowedEnums, Input}} |
| 949 |
|
end; |
| 950 |
|
enum_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 951 |
1 |
reject. |
| 952 |
|
|
| 953 |
|
%% @doc |
| 954 |
|
%% Validate against a list of rules for validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 955 |
|
%% Rule form: {any_of, [rule()]}. |
| 956 |
|
%% |
| 957 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 958 |
|
%% - valid when any rule validates (short-circuit). |
| 959 |
|
%% - normalized when no rule validates and at least one normalizes; output is |
| 960 |
|
%% from the first normalized rule; reason is {any_of, [reason()]}. |
| 961 |
|
%% - reject when no rule validates or normalizes; reason is {any_of, [reason()]}. |
| 962 |
|
%% - valid when the rule list is empty. |
| 963 |
|
%% |
| 964 |
|
%% Reasons are collected from each attempted rule (normalized or reject) in |
| 965 |
|
%% rule order. |
| 966 |
|
%% |
| 967 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the first normalized output when present; validate/2 |
| 968 |
|
%% accepts only the valid case and errors otherwise. |
| 969 |
|
%% |
| 970 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 971 |
|
%% ``` |
| 972 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(3, {any_of, [integer, {exact, ok}]}, #{}). |
| 973 |
|
%% {valid,3} |
| 974 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(<<"10">>, {any_of, [integer, {exact, ok}]}, #{}). |
| 975 |
|
%% {normalized,10,{any_of,[{invalid,integer,<<"10">>},{invalid_exact,ok,<<"10">>}]}} |
| 976 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(<<"nope">>, {any_of, [integer, {exact, ok}]}, #{}). |
| 977 |
|
%% {reject,{any_of,[{invalid,integer,<<"nope">>},{invalid_exact,ok,<<"nope">>}]}} |
| 978 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:normalize(<<"10">>, {any_of, [integer, {exact, ok}]}). |
| 979 |
|
%% 10 |
| 980 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:validate(3, {any_of, [integer, {exact, ok}]}). |
| 981 |
|
%% ok |
| 982 |
|
%% ''' |
| 983 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 984 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 985 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 986 |
|
-spec any_of_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 987 |
|
any_of_rule(_Input, [], _State) -> |
| 988 |
1 |
valid; |
| 989 |
|
any_of_rule(Input, Rules, State) when is_list(Rules) -> |
| 990 |
52558 |
any_of_rule_(Input, Rules, none, [], State); |
| 991 |
|
any_of_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 992 |
:-( |
reject. |
| 993 |
|
|
| 994 |
|
-spec any_of_rule_(input(), [rule()], klsn:optnl(output()), [reason()], state()) -> result(). |
| 995 |
|
any_of_rule_(_Input, [], {value, Output}, ReasonsRev, _State) -> |
| 996 |
13072 |
{normalized, Output, {any_of, lists:reverse(ReasonsRev)}}; |
| 997 |
|
any_of_rule_(_Input, [], none, ReasonsRev, _State) -> |
| 998 |
5 |
{reject, {any_of, lists:reverse(ReasonsRev)}}; |
| 999 |
|
any_of_rule_(Input, [Rule|T], MaybeOutput0, ReasonsRev0, State) -> |
| 1000 |
567014 |
case eval(Input, Rule, State) of |
| 1001 |
|
{valid, _} -> |
| 1002 |
39481 |
valid; |
| 1003 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 1004 |
35482 |
MaybeOutput = case MaybeOutput0 of |
| 1005 |
|
none -> |
| 1006 |
17484 |
{value, Output}; |
| 1007 |
|
_ -> |
| 1008 |
17998 |
MaybeOutput0 |
| 1009 |
|
end, |
| 1010 |
35482 |
any_of_rule_(Input, T, MaybeOutput, [Reason|ReasonsRev0], State); |
| 1011 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 1012 |
492051 |
any_of_rule_(Input, T, MaybeOutput0, [Reason|ReasonsRev0], State) |
| 1013 |
|
end. |
| 1014 |
|
|
| 1015 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1016 |
|
%% Apply all Rules; used by validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 1017 |
|
%% |
| 1018 |
|
%% Rule form: {all_of, [rule()]}. |
| 1019 |
|
%% Each rule is evaluated against the same Input in list order. |
| 1020 |
|
%% |
| 1021 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 1022 |
|
%% - valid when every rule returns valid (or Rules is empty). |
| 1023 |
|
%% - normalized when no rule rejects and at least one rule normalizes; output is |
| 1024 |
|
%% the first valid output if present, otherwise the first normalized output; |
| 1025 |
|
%% reason is {all_of, [reason()]} from the normalizing rules in list order. |
| 1026 |
|
%% - reject when any rule rejects; reason is {all_of, [reason()]} from the |
| 1027 |
|
%% rejecting rules in list order (normalization reasons are discarded). |
| 1028 |
|
%% |
| 1029 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the output and drops the reason; validate/2 errors on |
| 1030 |
|
%% normalized or reject results. |
| 1031 |
|
%% |
| 1032 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1033 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1034 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(5, {all_of, [integer, {range, {0, '=<', integer, '<', 10}}]}, #{}). |
| 1035 |
|
%% {valid, 5} |
| 1036 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(<<"5">>, {all_of, [integer, {range, {0, '=<', integer, '<', 10}}]}, #{}). |
| 1037 |
|
%% {normalized, 5, {all_of, [{invalid, integer, <<"5">>}, {invalid, integer, <<"5">>}]}} |
| 1038 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(20, {all_of, [integer, {range, {0, '=<', integer, '<', 10}}]}, #{}). |
| 1039 |
|
%% {reject, {all_of, [{invalid_range, {0, '=<', 20, '<', 10}}]}} |
| 1040 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1041 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1042 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1043 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1044 |
|
-spec all_of_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1045 |
|
all_of_rule(_Input, [], _State) -> |
| 1046 |
1 |
valid; |
| 1047 |
|
all_of_rule(Input, Rules, State) when is_list(Rules) -> |
| 1048 |
6 |
{MaybeValidOutput, MaybeNormOutput, NormReasonsRev, RejectReasonsRev} = |
| 1049 |
|
all_of_rule_(Input, Rules, none, none, [], [], State), |
| 1050 |
6 |
case RejectReasonsRev of |
| 1051 |
|
[] -> |
| 1052 |
5 |
case NormReasonsRev of |
| 1053 |
|
[] -> |
| 1054 |
1 |
valid; |
| 1055 |
|
_ -> |
| 1056 |
4 |
Output = case MaybeValidOutput of |
| 1057 |
|
{value, ValidOutput} -> |
| 1058 |
2 |
ValidOutput; |
| 1059 |
|
none -> |
| 1060 |
2 |
{value, NormOutput} = MaybeNormOutput, |
| 1061 |
2 |
NormOutput |
| 1062 |
|
end, |
| 1063 |
4 |
{normalized, Output, {all_of, lists:reverse(NormReasonsRev)}} |
| 1064 |
|
end; |
| 1065 |
|
_ -> |
| 1066 |
1 |
{reject, {all_of, lists:reverse(RejectReasonsRev)}} |
| 1067 |
|
end; |
| 1068 |
|
all_of_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 1069 |
:-( |
reject. |
| 1070 |
|
|
| 1071 |
|
-spec all_of_rule_( |
| 1072 |
|
input() |
| 1073 |
|
, [rule()] |
| 1074 |
|
, klsn:optnl(output()) |
| 1075 |
|
, klsn:optnl(output()) |
| 1076 |
|
, [reason()] |
| 1077 |
|
, [reason()] |
| 1078 |
|
, state() |
| 1079 |
|
) -> {klsn:optnl(output()), klsn:optnl(output()), [reason()], [reason()]}. |
| 1080 |
|
all_of_rule_(_Input, [], MaybeValidOutput, MaybeNormOutput, NormReasonsRev, RejectReasonsRev, _State) -> |
| 1081 |
6 |
{MaybeValidOutput, MaybeNormOutput, NormReasonsRev, RejectReasonsRev}; |
| 1082 |
|
all_of_rule_(Input, [Rule|T], MaybeValidOutput0, MaybeNormOutput0, NormReasonsRev0, RejectReasonsRev0, State) -> |
| 1083 |
12 |
case eval(Input, Rule, State) of |
| 1084 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 1085 |
4 |
MaybeValidOutput = case MaybeValidOutput0 of |
| 1086 |
|
none -> |
| 1087 |
3 |
{value, Output}; |
| 1088 |
|
_ -> |
| 1089 |
1 |
MaybeValidOutput0 |
| 1090 |
|
end, |
| 1091 |
4 |
all_of_rule_(Input, T, MaybeValidOutput, MaybeNormOutput0, NormReasonsRev0, RejectReasonsRev0, State); |
| 1092 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 1093 |
7 |
MaybeNormOutput = case MaybeNormOutput0 of |
| 1094 |
|
none -> |
| 1095 |
5 |
{value, Output}; |
| 1096 |
|
_ -> |
| 1097 |
2 |
MaybeNormOutput0 |
| 1098 |
|
end, |
| 1099 |
7 |
all_of_rule_(Input, T, MaybeValidOutput0, MaybeNormOutput, [Reason|NormReasonsRev0], RejectReasonsRev0, State); |
| 1100 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 1101 |
1 |
all_of_rule_(Input, T, MaybeValidOutput0, MaybeNormOutput0, NormReasonsRev0, [Reason|RejectReasonsRev0], State) |
| 1102 |
|
end. |
| 1103 |
|
|
| 1104 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1105 |
|
%% Apply rules left-to-right, feeding each output into the next rule. |
| 1106 |
|
%% Rule form: {foldl, [rule()]}. |
| 1107 |
|
%% |
| 1108 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 1109 |
|
%% - valid when every rule returns valid (output stays the original input). |
| 1110 |
|
%% - normalized when the first rule that normalizes succeeds; output is from the |
| 1111 |
|
%% last rule and the reason is from the first normalization. Later |
| 1112 |
|
%% normalizations keep the original reason. |
| 1113 |
|
%% - reject with the Reason from the first rule that rejects. |
| 1114 |
|
%% |
| 1115 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the last output; validate/2 raises on normalize/reject. |
| 1116 |
|
%% |
| 1117 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1118 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1119 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(ok, {foldl, [atom, {exact, ok}]}, #{}). |
| 1120 |
|
%% {valid, ok} |
| 1121 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval("ok", {foldl, [atom, {exact, ok}]}, #{}). |
| 1122 |
|
%% {normalized, ok, {invalid, atom, "ok"}} |
| 1123 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval("ok", {foldl, [atom, {exact, nope}]}, #{}). |
| 1124 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid_exact, nope, ok}} |
| 1125 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1126 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1127 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1128 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1129 |
|
-spec foldl_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1130 |
|
foldl_rule(Input, Rules, State) when is_list(Rules) -> |
| 1131 |
6 |
lists:foldl(fun(Rule, Acc) -> |
| 1132 |
9 |
case Acc of |
| 1133 |
|
{reject, _} -> |
| 1134 |
:-( |
Acc; |
| 1135 |
|
{valid, Value} -> |
| 1136 |
6 |
eval(Value, Rule, State); |
| 1137 |
|
{normalized, Value, Reason} -> |
| 1138 |
3 |
case eval(Value, Rule, State) of |
| 1139 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 1140 |
1 |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 1141 |
|
{normalized, Output, _Reason} -> |
| 1142 |
1 |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 1143 |
|
{reject, RejectReason} -> |
| 1144 |
1 |
{reject, RejectReason} |
| 1145 |
|
end |
| 1146 |
|
end |
| 1147 |
|
end, {valid, Input}, Rules); |
| 1148 |
|
foldl_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 1149 |
1 |
reject. |
| 1150 |
|
|
| 1151 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1152 |
|
%% Optional rule wrapper; use as {optnl, Rule} in rule() with validate/2, |
| 1153 |
|
%% normalize/2, or eval/3. Output is klsn:optnl(Output) |
| 1154 |
|
%% ({value, Output} or none). |
| 1155 |
|
%% |
| 1156 |
|
%% Input handling: |
| 1157 |
|
%% - none is valid and stays none. |
| 1158 |
|
%% - {value, V} validates V with Rule. |
| 1159 |
|
%% - null | nil | undefined | false | [] | error normalize to none. |
| 1160 |
|
%% - {ok, V} | {true, V} | [V] | binary() | number() are treated as values, |
| 1161 |
|
%% evaluated with Rule, and wrapped as {value, Output}. |
| 1162 |
|
%% |
| 1163 |
|
%% Result conditions (eval/3): |
| 1164 |
|
%% - valid when Input is none or {value, V} and Rule validates V. |
| 1165 |
|
%% - normalized when a wrapper/marker is converted or Rule normalizes V. |
| 1166 |
|
%% - reject when Input is unrecognized or Rule rejects V. |
| 1167 |
|
%% |
| 1168 |
|
%% Reasons (eval/3): |
| 1169 |
|
%% - {invalid, optnl, Input} when optnl_rule/3 normalizes without a rule reason |
| 1170 |
|
%% (markers/wrappers that validate) or when Input is unrecognized. |
| 1171 |
|
%% - {invalid_optnl_value, Reason} when Rule normalizes or rejects V. |
| 1172 |
|
%% |
| 1173 |
|
%% validate/2 only accepts valid; normalize/2 returns the output and drops |
| 1174 |
|
%% the reason. |
| 1175 |
|
%% |
| 1176 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1177 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1178 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(none, {optnl, integer}, #{}). |
| 1179 |
|
%% {valid, none} |
| 1180 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(null, {optnl, integer}, #{}). |
| 1181 |
|
%% {normalized, none, {invalid, optnl, null}} |
| 1182 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval({ok, 3}, {optnl, integer}, #{}). |
| 1183 |
|
%% {normalized, {value, 3}, {invalid, optnl, {ok, 3}}} |
| 1184 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval({value, 3}, {optnl, integer}, #{}). |
| 1185 |
|
%% {valid, {value, 3}} |
| 1186 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:eval({value, foo}, {optnl, integer}, #{}). |
| 1187 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid_optnl_value, {invalid, integer, foo}}} |
| 1188 |
|
%% 6> klsn_rule:normalize({ok, 3}, {optnl, integer}). |
| 1189 |
|
%% {value, 3} |
| 1190 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1191 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1192 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1193 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1194 |
|
-spec optnl_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1195 |
|
optnl_rule(Input, Rule, State) -> |
| 1196 |
30 |
case Input of |
| 1197 |
|
{value, Value0} -> |
| 1198 |
7 |
case eval(Value0, Rule, State) of |
| 1199 |
|
{valid, _} -> |
| 1200 |
2 |
valid; |
| 1201 |
|
{normalized, Value, Reason} -> |
| 1202 |
3 |
{normalized, {value, Value}, {invalid_optnl_value, Reason}}; |
| 1203 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 1204 |
2 |
{reject, {invalid_optnl_value, Reason}} |
| 1205 |
|
end; |
| 1206 |
|
none -> |
| 1207 |
1 |
valid; |
| 1208 |
|
_ -> |
| 1209 |
22 |
optnl_rule_(Input, Rule, State) |
| 1210 |
|
end. |
| 1211 |
|
optnl_rule_(Input, Rule, State) -> |
| 1212 |
22 |
InputResult = eval(Input, Rule, State), |
| 1213 |
22 |
NoneCanary = case eval(none, Rule, State) of |
| 1214 |
|
{valid, _} -> |
| 1215 |
|
%% We can't trust Rule to tell if it's optnl or raw value |
| 1216 |
1 |
valid; |
| 1217 |
|
{normalized, _, _} -> |
| 1218 |
|
%% We can't trust normalized result, but we can trust valid as raw value. |
| 1219 |
4 |
normalized; |
| 1220 |
|
{reject, _} -> |
| 1221 |
|
%% We can trust valid and normalized result as raw value |
| 1222 |
17 |
reject |
| 1223 |
|
end, |
| 1224 |
22 |
NoneAlt = case eval(Input, {enum, [undefined, null, nil, error, false]}, State) of |
| 1225 |
|
{valid, _} -> |
| 1226 |
5 |
valid; |
| 1227 |
|
{normalized, _, _} -> |
| 1228 |
1 |
normalized; |
| 1229 |
|
{reject, _} -> |
| 1230 |
16 |
reject |
| 1231 |
|
end, |
| 1232 |
22 |
ValueAltResult = case Input of |
| 1233 |
|
{_, Value0} -> |
| 1234 |
5 |
{value, eval(Value0, Rule, State)}; |
| 1235 |
|
[Value0] -> |
| 1236 |
1 |
{value, eval(Value0, Rule, State)}; |
| 1237 |
|
_ -> |
| 1238 |
16 |
none |
| 1239 |
|
end, |
| 1240 |
22 |
case {NoneCanary, NoneAlt, InputResult, ValueAltResult, Input} of |
| 1241 |
|
{valid, _, _, _, _} -> |
| 1242 |
1 |
reject; |
| 1243 |
|
{_, valid, _, _, _} -> |
| 1244 |
5 |
{normalized, none}; |
| 1245 |
|
{reject, normalized, _, _, _} -> |
| 1246 |
1 |
{normalized, none}; |
| 1247 |
|
{_, _, {reject, _}, {value, {valid, Value}}, _} -> |
| 1248 |
4 |
{normalized, {value, Value}}; |
| 1249 |
|
{_, _, {reject, _}, {value, {normalized, Value, _}}, _} -> |
| 1250 |
1 |
{normalized, {value, Value}}; |
| 1251 |
|
{_, _, {normalized, _, _}, {value, {valid, Value}}, _} -> |
| 1252 |
1 |
{normalized, {value, Value}}; |
| 1253 |
|
{_, _, {reject, _}, _, []} -> |
| 1254 |
1 |
{normalized, none}; |
| 1255 |
|
{_, _, {normalized, [], _}, _, _} -> |
| 1256 |
1 |
reject; |
| 1257 |
|
{_, _, {normalized, _, _}, _, []} -> |
| 1258 |
1 |
{normalized, none}; |
| 1259 |
|
{reject, _, {valid, Value}, _, _} -> |
| 1260 |
2 |
{normalized, {value, Value}}; |
| 1261 |
|
{reject, _, {normalized, Value, _}, _, _} -> |
| 1262 |
1 |
{normalized, {value, Value}}; |
| 1263 |
|
{normalized, _, {valid, Value}, _, _} -> |
| 1264 |
1 |
{normalized, {value, Value}}; |
| 1265 |
|
_ -> |
| 1266 |
2 |
reject |
| 1267 |
|
end. |
| 1268 |
|
|
| 1269 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1270 |
|
%% Validate a nullable rule used by validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 1271 |
|
%% Rule form: {nullable, Rule} where Rule is a rule(). |
| 1272 |
|
%% |
| 1273 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 1274 |
|
%% - valid when Input is null. |
| 1275 |
|
%% - normalized to null when Input is none. |
| 1276 |
|
%% - valid when Input is Value and Rule validates. |
| 1277 |
|
%% - normalized when Input is {value, Value} and Rule validates. |
| 1278 |
|
%% - normalized with {invalid_nullable_value, Reason} when Rule normalizes. |
| 1279 |
|
%% - reject with {invalid_nullable_value, Reason} when Rule rejects. |
| 1280 |
|
%% |
| 1281 |
|
%% Reasons (eval/3): |
| 1282 |
|
%% - {invalid, nullable, Input} when nullable_rule/3 normalizes without a rule |
| 1283 |
|
%% reason (none or {value, Value} when Rule validates). |
| 1284 |
|
%% - {invalid_nullable_value, Reason} when Rule normalizes or rejects Value. |
| 1285 |
|
%% |
| 1286 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1287 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1288 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(null, {nullable, integer}, #{}). |
| 1289 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(none, {nullable, integer}, #{}). |
| 1290 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(<<"12">>, {nullable, integer}, #{}). |
| 1291 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval({value, <<"12">>}, {nullable, integer}, #{}). |
| 1292 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1293 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1294 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1295 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1296 |
|
-spec nullable_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1297 |
|
nullable_rule(null, _Rule, _State) -> |
| 1298 |
4 |
valid; |
| 1299 |
|
nullable_rule(none, _Rule, _State) -> |
| 1300 |
4 |
{normalized, null}; |
| 1301 |
|
nullable_rule({value, Value}, Rule, State) -> |
| 1302 |
8 |
nullable_eval_value_(Value, Rule, normalized, State); |
| 1303 |
|
nullable_rule(Value, Rule, State) -> |
| 1304 |
5 |
nullable_eval_value_(Value, Rule, valid, State). |
| 1305 |
|
|
| 1306 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1307 |
|
%% Enforce strict evaluation when used as {strict, Rule}. |
| 1308 |
|
%% Rule form: {strict, Rule} where Rule :: rule(). |
| 1309 |
|
%% |
| 1310 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 1311 |
|
%% - valid when Rule returns {valid, Output}. |
| 1312 |
|
%% - normalized is never returned; when Rule normalizes with |
| 1313 |
|
%% {normalized, Output, Reason}, this rule rejects with {strict, Reason}. |
| 1314 |
|
%% - reject when Rule rejects; the Reason passes through unchanged. |
| 1315 |
|
%% |
| 1316 |
|
%% validate/2 and normalize/2 only succeed on valid. When strict rejects, |
| 1317 |
|
%% they raise error({klsn_rule, Reason}) where Reason is the reject reason above. |
| 1318 |
|
%% |
| 1319 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1320 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1321 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(42, {strict, integer}, #{}). |
| 1322 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(<<"42">>, {strict, integer}, #{}). |
| 1323 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:normalize(42, {strict, integer}). |
| 1324 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1325 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1326 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1327 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1328 |
|
-spec strict_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1329 |
|
strict_rule(Input, Rule, State) -> |
| 1330 |
4 |
case eval(Input, Rule, State) of |
| 1331 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 1332 |
1 |
{valid, Output}; |
| 1333 |
|
{normalized, _Output, Reason} -> |
| 1334 |
2 |
{reject, {strict, Reason}}; |
| 1335 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 1336 |
1 |
{reject, Reason} |
| 1337 |
|
end. |
| 1338 |
|
|
| 1339 |
|
-spec nullable_eval_value_(input(), rule(), valid | normalized, state()) -> result(). |
| 1340 |
|
nullable_eval_value_(Value, Rule, Validity, State) -> |
| 1341 |
13 |
case eval(Value, Rule, State) of |
| 1342 |
|
{valid, Output} -> |
| 1343 |
4 |
case Validity of |
| 1344 |
|
valid -> |
| 1345 |
:-( |
{valid, Output}; |
| 1346 |
|
normalized -> |
| 1347 |
4 |
{normalized, Output} |
| 1348 |
|
end; |
| 1349 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 1350 |
5 |
{normalized, Output, {invalid_nullable_value, Reason}}; |
| 1351 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 1352 |
4 |
{reject, {invalid_nullable_value, Reason}} |
| 1353 |
|
end. |
| 1354 |
|
|
| 1355 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1356 |
|
%% Validate list inputs by applying an element rule to each entry. |
| 1357 |
|
%% |
| 1358 |
|
%% Rule form: `{list, ElementRule}' where `ElementRule :: rule()'. |
| 1359 |
|
%% |
| 1360 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 1361 |
|
%% - valid when Input is a list and every element validates (no normalization). |
| 1362 |
|
%% - normalized when Input is a list, no element rejects, and the first |
| 1363 |
|
%% normalized element is at Index (1-based); output is a list of element |
| 1364 |
|
%% outputs; reason is {invalid_list_element, Index, Reason}. |
| 1365 |
|
%% - reject when Input is not a list; reason is {invalid, list, Input}. |
| 1366 |
|
%% - reject when the first rejecting element is at Index; reason is |
| 1367 |
|
%% {invalid_list_element, Index, Reason}. |
| 1368 |
|
%% |
| 1369 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the output list on valid/normalized and raises on reject. |
| 1370 |
|
%% validate/2 returns ok only on valid; it raises on normalized/reject. |
| 1371 |
|
%% |
| 1372 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1373 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1374 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval([1, 2], {list, integer}, #{}). |
| 1375 |
|
%% {valid, [1, 2]} |
| 1376 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval([<<"1">>, <<"2">>], {list, integer}, #{}). |
| 1377 |
|
%% {normalized, [1, 2], {invalid_list_element, 1, {invalid, integer, <<"1">>}}} |
| 1378 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval([1, <<"bad">>], {list, integer}, #{}). |
| 1379 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid_list_element, 2, {invalid, integer, <<"bad">>}}} |
| 1380 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval(<<"1">>, {list, integer}, #{}). |
| 1381 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid, list, <<"1">>}} |
| 1382 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:normalize([<<"1">>], {list, integer}). |
| 1383 |
|
%% [1] |
| 1384 |
|
%% 6> klsn_rule:validate([<<"1">>], {list, integer}). |
| 1385 |
|
%% ** exception error: {klsn_rule,{invalid_list_element,1,{invalid,integer,<<"1">>}}} |
| 1386 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1387 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1388 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1389 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1390 |
|
-spec list_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1391 |
|
list_rule(Input, ElementRule, State) when is_list(Input) -> |
| 1392 |
24624 |
List0 = lists:map(fun(Elem) -> |
| 1393 |
42038 |
eval(Elem, ElementRule, State) |
| 1394 |
|
end, Input), |
| 1395 |
24624 |
List = lists:zip(lists:seq(1, length(List0)), List0), |
| 1396 |
24624 |
MaybeReject = lists:search(fun |
| 1397 |
|
({_I, {reject, _}})-> |
| 1398 |
1 |
true; |
| 1399 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1400 |
42037 |
false |
| 1401 |
|
end, List), |
| 1402 |
24624 |
case MaybeReject of |
| 1403 |
|
{value, {I, {reject, Reason}}} -> |
| 1404 |
1 |
{reject, {invalid_list_element, I, Reason}}; |
| 1405 |
|
_ -> |
| 1406 |
24623 |
MaybeNormalized = lists:search(fun |
| 1407 |
|
({_I, {normalized, _, _}})-> |
| 1408 |
2337 |
true; |
| 1409 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1410 |
36284 |
false |
| 1411 |
|
end, List), |
| 1412 |
24623 |
case MaybeNormalized of |
| 1413 |
|
{value, {I, {normalized, _, Reason}}} -> |
| 1414 |
2337 |
Output = lists:map(fun |
| 1415 |
|
({_I, {valid, ElemOutput}}) -> |
| 1416 |
1 |
ElemOutput; |
| 1417 |
|
({_I, {normalized, ElemOutput, _}}) -> |
| 1418 |
5752 |
ElemOutput |
| 1419 |
|
end, List), |
| 1420 |
2337 |
{normalized, Output, {invalid_list_element, I, Reason}}; |
| 1421 |
|
_ -> |
| 1422 |
22286 |
valid |
| 1423 |
|
end |
| 1424 |
|
end; |
| 1425 |
|
list_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 1426 |
24370 |
reject. |
| 1427 |
|
|
| 1428 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1429 |
|
%% Validate tuple inputs against element rules. |
| 1430 |
|
%% |
| 1431 |
|
%% Rule form: {tuple, Rules} where Rules is a list or tuple of rule(). |
| 1432 |
|
%% |
| 1433 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 1434 |
|
%% - valid when Input is a tuple, arity matches Rules, and all elements validate. |
| 1435 |
|
%% - normalized when Input is a tuple, no element rejects, and the first |
| 1436 |
|
%% normalized element is at Index; output is a tuple of element outputs; reason |
| 1437 |
|
%% is {invalid_tuple_element, Index, Reason}. |
| 1438 |
|
%% - reject when Input is not a tuple; reason is {invalid, tuple, Input}. |
| 1439 |
|
%% - reject when arity mismatches; reason is {invalid_tuple_size, Expected, Input}. |
| 1440 |
|
%% - reject when the first element to reject is at Index; reason is |
| 1441 |
|
%% {invalid_tuple_element, Index, Reason}. |
| 1442 |
|
%% |
| 1443 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the tuple output on valid/normalized and raises on reject. |
| 1444 |
|
%% validate/2 returns ok only for valid results (normalized counts as invalid). |
| 1445 |
|
%% |
| 1446 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1447 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1448 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval({1, ok}, {tuple, [integer, atom]}, #{}). |
| 1449 |
|
%% {valid, {1, ok}} |
| 1450 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval({"1", ok}, {tuple, [integer, atom]}, #{}). |
| 1451 |
|
%% {normalized, {1, ok}, {invalid_tuple_element, 1, {invalid, integer, "1"}}} |
| 1452 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval({1, ok}, {tuple, {integer, atom}}, #{}). |
| 1453 |
|
%% {valid, {1, ok}} |
| 1454 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval({1}, {tuple, [integer, atom]}, #{}). |
| 1455 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid_tuple_size, 2, {1}}} |
| 1456 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:eval([1, ok], {tuple, [integer, atom]}, #{}). |
| 1457 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid, tuple, [1, ok]}} |
| 1458 |
|
%% 6> klsn_rule:normalize({ok, ok}, {tuple, [integer, atom]}). |
| 1459 |
|
%% exception error: {klsn_rule,{invalid_tuple_element,1,{invalid,integer,ok}}} |
| 1460 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1461 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1462 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1463 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1464 |
|
-spec tuple_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1465 |
|
tuple_rule(Input, Rules, State) when is_tuple(Input), is_tuple(Rules) -> |
| 1466 |
6 |
tuple_rule(Input, tuple_to_list(Rules), State); |
| 1467 |
|
tuple_rule(Input, Rules, _State) when is_tuple(Input), is_list(Rules), length(Rules) =/= tuple_size(Input) -> |
| 1468 |
1 |
{reject, {invalid_tuple_size, length(Rules), Input}}; |
| 1469 |
|
tuple_rule(Input, Rules, State) when is_tuple(Input), is_list(Rules) -> |
| 1470 |
9 |
InputList = tuple_to_list(Input), |
| 1471 |
9 |
List0 = lists:map(fun({Rule, Elem}) -> |
| 1472 |
16 |
eval(Elem, Rule, State) |
| 1473 |
|
end, lists:zip(Rules, InputList)), |
| 1474 |
9 |
List = lists:zip(lists:seq(1, length(List0)), List0), |
| 1475 |
9 |
MaybeReject = lists:search(fun |
| 1476 |
|
({_I, {reject, _}})-> |
| 1477 |
1 |
true; |
| 1478 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1479 |
15 |
false |
| 1480 |
|
end, List), |
| 1481 |
9 |
case MaybeReject of |
| 1482 |
|
{value, {I, {reject, Reason}}} -> |
| 1483 |
1 |
{reject, {invalid_tuple_element, I, Reason}}; |
| 1484 |
|
_ -> |
| 1485 |
8 |
MaybeNormalized = lists:search(fun |
| 1486 |
|
({_I, {normalized, _, _}})-> |
| 1487 |
3 |
true; |
| 1488 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1489 |
10 |
false |
| 1490 |
|
end, List), |
| 1491 |
8 |
case MaybeNormalized of |
| 1492 |
|
{value, {I, {normalized, _, Reason}}} -> |
| 1493 |
3 |
Output = lists:map(fun |
| 1494 |
|
({_I, {valid, ElemOutput}}) -> |
| 1495 |
2 |
ElemOutput; |
| 1496 |
|
({_I, {normalized, ElemOutput, _}}) -> |
| 1497 |
3 |
ElemOutput |
| 1498 |
|
end, List), |
| 1499 |
3 |
{normalized, list_to_tuple(Output), {invalid_tuple_element, I, Reason}}; |
| 1500 |
|
_ -> |
| 1501 |
5 |
valid |
| 1502 |
|
end |
| 1503 |
|
end; |
| 1504 |
|
tuple_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 1505 |
5 |
reject. |
| 1506 |
|
|
| 1507 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1508 |
|
%% Validate map input for validate/2, normalize/2, and eval/3. |
| 1509 |
|
%% Rule form: {map, {KeyRule, ValueRule}} where KeyRule and ValueRule are rule(). |
| 1510 |
|
%% |
| 1511 |
|
%% Result (eval/3): |
| 1512 |
|
%% - valid when Input is a map and all keys/values validate without normalization. |
| 1513 |
|
%% - normalized when Input is a map, no key/value rejects, and at least one |
| 1514 |
|
%% key or value normalizes; output is a map with normalized keys/values. |
| 1515 |
|
%% - reject when Input is not a map, when a key or value rejects, when |
| 1516 |
|
%% normalized keys collide, or when the rule parameter is not {KeyRule, ValueRule}. |
| 1517 |
|
%% |
| 1518 |
|
%% Reason (eval/3): |
| 1519 |
|
%% - {invalid, map, Input} when Input is not a map or the rule parameter is invalid. |
| 1520 |
|
%% - {invalid_map_key, Reason} when a key rejects or normalizes. |
| 1521 |
|
%% - {invalid_map_value, Key, Reason} when a value rejects or normalizes |
| 1522 |
|
%% (Key is the original input key). |
| 1523 |
|
%% - {map_key_conflict, Key} when key normalization produces duplicates. |
| 1524 |
|
%% |
| 1525 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the (possibly normalized) map and drops the reason. |
| 1526 |
|
%% validate/2 returns ok only for valid results; it raises on normalized or reject. |
| 1527 |
|
%% |
| 1528 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1529 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1530 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(#{1 => 2}, {map, {integer, integer}}, #{}). |
| 1531 |
|
%% {valid, #{1 => 2}} |
| 1532 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(#{1 => "2"}, {map, {integer, integer}}, #{}). |
| 1533 |
|
%% {normalized, #{1 => 2}, {invalid_map_value, 1, {invalid, integer, "2"}}} |
| 1534 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(#{"nope" => 1}, {map, {integer, integer}}, #{}). |
| 1535 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid_map_key, {invalid, integer, "nope"}}} |
| 1536 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval(#{"1" => a, 1 => b}, {map, {integer, term}}, #{}). |
| 1537 |
|
%% {reject, {map_key_conflict, 1}} |
| 1538 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:eval([1, 2], {map, {integer, integer}}, #{}). |
| 1539 |
|
%% {reject, {invalid, map, [1, 2]}} |
| 1540 |
|
%% 6> klsn_rule:normalize(#{"1" => "2"}, {map, {integer, integer}}). |
| 1541 |
|
%% #{1 => 2} |
| 1542 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1543 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1544 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1545 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1546 |
|
-spec map_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1547 |
|
map_rule(Input, {KeyRule, ValueRule}, State) when is_map(Input) -> |
| 1548 |
7466 |
List0 = lists:map(fun({Key, Value}) -> |
| 1549 |
22186 |
{Key, eval(Key, KeyRule, State), eval(Value, ValueRule, State)} |
| 1550 |
|
end, maps:to_list(Input)), |
| 1551 |
7466 |
MaybeKeyReject = lists:search(fun |
| 1552 |
|
({_Key, {reject, _}, _}) -> |
| 1553 |
1 |
true; |
| 1554 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1555 |
22185 |
false |
| 1556 |
|
end, List0), |
| 1557 |
7466 |
case MaybeKeyReject of |
| 1558 |
|
{value, {_Key, {reject, Reason}, _}} -> |
| 1559 |
1 |
{reject, {invalid_map_key, Reason}}; |
| 1560 |
|
_ -> |
| 1561 |
7465 |
MaybeValueReject = lists:search(fun |
| 1562 |
|
({_Key, _KeyRes, {reject, _}}) -> |
| 1563 |
1 |
true; |
| 1564 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1565 |
22184 |
false |
| 1566 |
|
end, List0), |
| 1567 |
7465 |
case MaybeValueReject of |
| 1568 |
|
{value, {Key, _KeyRes, {reject, Reason}}} -> |
| 1569 |
1 |
{reject, {invalid_map_value, Key, Reason}}; |
| 1570 |
|
_ -> |
| 1571 |
7464 |
MaybeNormalized = lists:search(fun |
| 1572 |
|
({_Key, {normalized, _, _}, _}) -> |
| 1573 |
4 |
true; |
| 1574 |
|
({_Key, _KeyRes, {normalized, _, _}}) -> |
| 1575 |
2753 |
true; |
| 1576 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1577 |
12965 |
false |
| 1578 |
|
end, List0), |
| 1579 |
7464 |
MaybeNormReason = case MaybeNormalized of |
| 1580 |
|
{value, {_Key, {normalized, _, Reason}, _}} -> |
| 1581 |
4 |
{value, {invalid_map_key, Reason}}; |
| 1582 |
|
{value, {Key, _KeyRes, {normalized, _, Reason}}} -> |
| 1583 |
2753 |
{value, {invalid_map_value, Key, Reason}}; |
| 1584 |
|
_ -> |
| 1585 |
4707 |
none |
| 1586 |
|
end, |
| 1587 |
7464 |
case MaybeNormReason of |
| 1588 |
|
{value, NormReason} -> |
| 1589 |
2757 |
OutputList = lists:map(fun({_Key0, KeyRes0, ValueRes0}) -> |
| 1590 |
9289 |
Key1 = case KeyRes0 of |
| 1591 |
|
{valid, KeyOut} -> |
| 1592 |
9284 |
KeyOut; |
| 1593 |
|
{normalized, KeyOut, _} -> |
| 1594 |
5 |
KeyOut |
| 1595 |
|
end, |
| 1596 |
9289 |
Value1 = case ValueRes0 of |
| 1597 |
|
{valid, ValueOut} -> |
| 1598 |
129 |
ValueOut; |
| 1599 |
|
{normalized, ValueOut, _} -> |
| 1600 |
9160 |
ValueOut |
| 1601 |
|
end, |
| 1602 |
9289 |
{Key1, Value1} |
| 1603 |
|
end, List0), |
| 1604 |
2757 |
MaybeKeyConflict = lists:foldl(fun({Key1, _Value1}, Acc) -> |
| 1605 |
9289 |
case Acc of |
| 1606 |
|
{value, _} -> |
| 1607 |
1 |
Acc; |
| 1608 |
|
Seen -> |
| 1609 |
9288 |
case maps:is_key(Key1, Seen) of |
| 1610 |
|
true -> |
| 1611 |
2 |
{value, Key1}; |
| 1612 |
|
false -> |
| 1613 |
9286 |
maps:put(Key1, true, Seen) |
| 1614 |
|
end |
| 1615 |
|
end |
| 1616 |
|
end, #{}, OutputList), |
| 1617 |
2757 |
case MaybeKeyConflict of |
| 1618 |
|
{value, Key1} -> |
| 1619 |
2 |
{reject, {map_key_conflict, Key1}}; |
| 1620 |
|
_ -> |
| 1621 |
2755 |
{normalized, maps:from_list(OutputList), NormReason} |
| 1622 |
|
end; |
| 1623 |
|
_ -> |
| 1624 |
4707 |
valid |
| 1625 |
|
end |
| 1626 |
|
end |
| 1627 |
|
end; |
| 1628 |
|
map_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 1629 |
1 |
reject. |
| 1630 |
|
|
| 1631 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1632 |
|
%% Validate struct maps against a field spec for use with validate/2, normalize/2, |
| 1633 |
|
%% and eval/3. |
| 1634 |
|
%% |
| 1635 |
|
%% Rule form: {struct, #{Field => {required | optional, rule()}}}. |
| 1636 |
|
%% Field must be an atom; Input must be a map. Keys are matched by comparing |
| 1637 |
|
%% klsn_binstr:from_any(Key) and klsn_binstr:from_any(Field), so Field, |
| 1638 |
|
%% `<<"field">>', and "field" are treated as the same field. |
| 1639 |
|
%% |
| 1640 |
|
%% Output normalization: |
| 1641 |
|
%% - extra keys are dropped, |
| 1642 |
|
%% - matched keys are normalized to their atom field names, |
| 1643 |
|
%% - field values are normalized when their rule normalizes. |
| 1644 |
|
%% |
| 1645 |
|
%% When evaluated via {@link eval/3}: |
| 1646 |
|
%% - valid when all required fields are present, no extra or duplicate keys |
| 1647 |
|
%% exist, and all field rules return valid. |
| 1648 |
|
%% - normalized when extra keys are removed, keys are normalized, or any field |
| 1649 |
|
%% value normalizes. Reasons are: |
| 1650 |
|
%% {invalid_struct_field, Key} for extra keys or key normalization, and |
| 1651 |
|
%% {invalid_struct_value, Field, Reason} for value normalization. |
| 1652 |
|
%% When multiple normalization causes exist, the reason reports extra keys |
| 1653 |
|
%% first, then key normalization, then value normalization. |
| 1654 |
|
%% - reject when required fields are missing, a field has duplicate keys, or a |
| 1655 |
|
%% field rule rejects. Reasons are: |
| 1656 |
|
%% {missing_required_field, Field}, |
| 1657 |
|
%% {struct_field_conflict, Field}, |
| 1658 |
|
%% {invalid_struct_value, Field, Reason}. |
| 1659 |
|
%% - reject with {invalid, struct, Input} when Input or the spec is malformed. |
| 1660 |
|
%% |
| 1661 |
|
%% normalize/2 returns the output map and drops the reason. |
| 1662 |
|
%% validate/2 raises error({klsn_rule, Reason}) on normalized or reject. |
| 1663 |
|
%% |
| 1664 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1665 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1666 |
|
%% 1> Rule = {struct, #{name => {required, binstr}, age => {optional, integer}}}. |
| 1667 |
|
%% 2> klsn_rule:eval(#{name => <<"Ada">>, age => 32}, Rule, #{}). |
| 1668 |
|
%% {valid, #{name => <<"Ada">>, age => 32}} |
| 1669 |
|
%% 3> klsn_rule:eval(#{<<"name">> => <<"Ada">>, age => <<"42">>}, Rule, #{}). |
| 1670 |
|
%% {normalized, #{name => <<"Ada">>, age => 42}, |
| 1671 |
|
%% {invalid_struct_field, <<"name">>}} |
| 1672 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:normalize(#{<<"name">> => <<"Ada">>, extra => 1}, Rule). |
| 1673 |
|
%% #{name => <<"Ada">>} |
| 1674 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:eval(#{age => 32}, Rule, #{}). |
| 1675 |
|
%% {reject, {missing_required_field, name}} |
| 1676 |
|
%% 6> klsn_rule:eval(#{name => <<"Ada">>, <<"name">> => <<"Ada">>}, Rule, #{}). |
| 1677 |
|
%% {reject, {struct_field_conflict, name}} |
| 1678 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1679 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1680 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1681 |
|
%% @see eval/3 |
| 1682 |
|
-spec struct_rule(input(), rule_param(), state()) -> result(). |
| 1683 |
|
struct_rule(Input, StructSpec, State) when is_map(Input), is_map(StructSpec) -> |
| 1684 |
477215 |
SpecList0 = maps:to_list(StructSpec), |
| 1685 |
477215 |
SpecList = lists:map(fun |
| 1686 |
|
({Field, {ReqOpt, Rule}}) when is_atom(Field), (ReqOpt =:= required orelse ReqOpt =:= optional) -> |
| 1687 |
1637097 |
{Field, {ReqOpt, Rule}}; |
| 1688 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1689 |
1 |
error |
| 1690 |
|
end, SpecList0), |
| 1691 |
477215 |
case lists:member(error, SpecList) of |
| 1692 |
|
true -> |
| 1693 |
1 |
reject; |
| 1694 |
|
false -> |
| 1695 |
477214 |
BinToField = maps:from_list(lists:map(fun({Field, _}) -> |
| 1696 |
1637097 |
{klsn_binstr:from_any(Field), Field} |
| 1697 |
|
end, SpecList)), |
| 1698 |
477214 |
InputList = maps:to_list(Input), |
| 1699 |
477214 |
{Matches0, ExtraKeysRev, KeyNormKeysRev} = lists:foldl(fun({Key, Value}, {MatchesAcc, ExtraAcc, NormAcc}) -> |
| 1700 |
895629 |
case maybe_binstr_from_any_(Key) of |
| 1701 |
|
{value, KeyBin} -> |
| 1702 |
895628 |
case maps:find(KeyBin, BinToField) of |
| 1703 |
|
{ok, Field} -> |
| 1704 |
278076 |
Existing = maps:get(Field, MatchesAcc, []), |
| 1705 |
278076 |
MatchesAcc1 = maps:put(Field, [{Key, Value}|Existing], MatchesAcc), |
| 1706 |
278076 |
NormAcc1 = case Key =:= Field of |
| 1707 |
|
true -> |
| 1708 |
156142 |
NormAcc; |
| 1709 |
|
false -> |
| 1710 |
121934 |
[Key|NormAcc] |
| 1711 |
|
end, |
| 1712 |
278076 |
{MatchesAcc1, ExtraAcc, NormAcc1}; |
| 1713 |
|
error -> |
| 1714 |
617552 |
{MatchesAcc, [Key|ExtraAcc], NormAcc} |
| 1715 |
|
end; |
| 1716 |
|
none -> |
| 1717 |
1 |
{MatchesAcc, [Key|ExtraAcc], NormAcc} |
| 1718 |
|
end |
| 1719 |
|
end, {#{}, [], []}, InputList), |
| 1720 |
477214 |
ExtraKeys = lists:reverse(ExtraKeysRev), |
| 1721 |
477214 |
KeyNormKeys = lists:reverse(KeyNormKeysRev), |
| 1722 |
477214 |
MaybeConflict = lists:search(fun({Field, _}) -> |
| 1723 |
1637097 |
case maps:get(Field, Matches0, []) of |
| 1724 |
1359023 |
[] -> false; |
| 1725 |
278072 |
[_] -> false; |
| 1726 |
2 |
[_|_] -> true |
| 1727 |
|
end |
| 1728 |
|
end, SpecList), |
| 1729 |
477214 |
case MaybeConflict of |
| 1730 |
|
{value, {Field, _}} -> |
| 1731 |
2 |
{reject, {struct_field_conflict, Field}}; |
| 1732 |
|
_ -> |
| 1733 |
477212 |
MaybeMissingRequired = lists:search(fun |
| 1734 |
|
({Field, {required, _}}) -> |
| 1735 |
464205 |
maps:get(Field, Matches0, []) =:= []; |
| 1736 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1737 |
1024465 |
false |
| 1738 |
|
end, SpecList), |
| 1739 |
477212 |
case MaybeMissingRequired of |
| 1740 |
|
{value, {Field, _}} -> |
| 1741 |
240539 |
{reject, {missing_required_field, Field}}; |
| 1742 |
|
_ -> |
| 1743 |
236673 |
case struct_eval_fields_(SpecList, Matches0, #{}, none, State) of |
| 1744 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 1745 |
150968 |
{reject, Reason}; |
| 1746 |
|
{ok, Output, MaybeValueNormReason} -> |
| 1747 |
85705 |
IsNormalized = (ExtraKeys =/= []) orelse (KeyNormKeys =/= []) orelse (MaybeValueNormReason =/= none), |
| 1748 |
85705 |
case IsNormalized of |
| 1749 |
|
false -> |
| 1750 |
57654 |
valid; |
| 1751 |
|
true -> |
| 1752 |
28051 |
NormReason = case ExtraKeys of |
| 1753 |
|
[ExtraKey|_] -> |
| 1754 |
21289 |
{invalid_struct_field, ExtraKey}; |
| 1755 |
|
[] -> |
| 1756 |
6762 |
case KeyNormKeys of |
| 1757 |
|
[KeyNormKey|_] -> |
| 1758 |
6759 |
{invalid_struct_field, KeyNormKey}; |
| 1759 |
|
[] -> |
| 1760 |
3 |
klsn_maybe:get_value(MaybeValueNormReason) |
| 1761 |
|
end |
| 1762 |
|
end, |
| 1763 |
28051 |
{normalized, Output, NormReason} |
| 1764 |
|
end |
| 1765 |
|
end |
| 1766 |
|
end |
| 1767 |
|
end |
| 1768 |
|
end; |
| 1769 |
|
struct_rule(_, _, _State) -> |
| 1770 |
1 |
reject. |
| 1771 |
|
|
| 1772 |
|
-spec maybe_binstr_from_any_(term()) -> klsn:optnl(klsn:binstr()). |
| 1773 |
|
maybe_binstr_from_any_(Value) -> |
| 1774 |
895629 |
try |
| 1775 |
895629 |
{value, klsn_binstr:from_any(Value)} |
| 1776 |
|
catch |
| 1777 |
|
_:_ -> |
| 1778 |
1 |
none |
| 1779 |
|
end. |
| 1780 |
|
|
| 1781 |
|
-spec struct_eval_fields_( |
| 1782 |
|
[{atom(), {required | optional, rule()}}] |
| 1783 |
|
, #{atom() => [{term(), term()}]} |
| 1784 |
|
, maps:map(atom(), term()) |
| 1785 |
|
, klsn:optnl(reason()) |
| 1786 |
|
, state() |
| 1787 |
|
) -> {ok, maps:map(atom(), term()), klsn:optnl(reason())} | {reject, reason()}. |
| 1788 |
|
struct_eval_fields_([], _Matches, Output, MaybeNormReason, _State) -> |
| 1789 |
85705 |
{ok, Output, MaybeNormReason}; |
| 1790 |
|
struct_eval_fields_([{Field, {_ReqOpt, Rule}}|T], Matches, Output0, MaybeNormReason0, State) -> |
| 1791 |
635975 |
case maps:get(Field, Matches, []) of |
| 1792 |
|
[] -> |
| 1793 |
382097 |
struct_eval_fields_(T, Matches, Output0, MaybeNormReason0, State); |
| 1794 |
|
[{_Key, Value}] -> |
| 1795 |
253878 |
case eval(Value, Rule, State) of |
| 1796 |
|
{valid, ValueOut} -> |
| 1797 |
88335 |
struct_eval_fields_(T, Matches, maps:put(Field, ValueOut, Output0), MaybeNormReason0, State); |
| 1798 |
|
{normalized, ValueOut, Reason} -> |
| 1799 |
14575 |
MaybeNormReason1 = case MaybeNormReason0 of |
| 1800 |
|
none -> |
| 1801 |
11186 |
{value, {invalid_struct_value, Field, Reason}}; |
| 1802 |
|
_ -> |
| 1803 |
3389 |
MaybeNormReason0 |
| 1804 |
|
end, |
| 1805 |
14575 |
struct_eval_fields_(T, Matches, maps:put(Field, ValueOut, Output0), MaybeNormReason1, State); |
| 1806 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 1807 |
150968 |
{reject, {invalid_struct_value, Field, Reason}} |
| 1808 |
|
end; |
| 1809 |
|
_ -> |
| 1810 |
:-( |
{reject, {struct_field_conflict, Field}} |
| 1811 |
|
end. |
| 1812 |
|
|
| 1813 |
|
-spec do(fun((input()) -> boolean()), [fun((input()) -> output())], input()) -> result(). |
| 1814 |
|
do(Guard, Converts, Input) -> |
| 1815 |
12060 |
try Guard(Input) of |
| 1816 |
|
true -> |
| 1817 |
2590 |
valid; |
| 1818 |
|
false -> |
| 1819 |
9470 |
do(Converts, Input) |
| 1820 |
|
catch _:_ -> |
| 1821 |
:-( |
do(Converts, Input) |
| 1822 |
|
end. |
| 1823 |
|
|
| 1824 |
|
-spec do([fun((input()) -> output())], input()) -> result(). |
| 1825 |
|
do([], _Input) -> |
| 1826 |
5283 |
reject; |
| 1827 |
|
do([H|T], Input) -> |
| 1828 |
88250 |
try H(Input) of |
| 1829 |
|
Output when Output =:= Input -> |
| 1830 |
62404 |
valid; |
| 1831 |
|
Output -> |
| 1832 |
7415 |
{normalized, Output} |
| 1833 |
|
catch _:_ -> |
| 1834 |
18431 |
do(T, Input) |
| 1835 |
|
end. |
| 1836 |
|
|
| 1837 |
|
|
| 1838 |
|
%% @doc |
| 1839 |
|
%% Evaluate a rule against an input and return a strict result. |
| 1840 |
|
%% |
| 1841 |
|
%% Builtin rules may be passed as atoms (for example, `integer') or |
| 1842 |
|
%% tuples; they are dispatched to `name_rule/3' functions. Unknown |
| 1843 |
|
%% rules return `{reject, {unknown_rule, Rule}}'. |
| 1844 |
|
%% |
| 1845 |
|
%% Custom rules use `{custom, Name, Fun, Param}' where |
| 1846 |
|
%% `Fun(Input, Param, State) -> result()'. Return handling: |
| 1847 |
|
%% - `valid' or `{valid, Input}' maps to `{valid, Input}' |
| 1848 |
|
%% - `{valid, Output}' with `Output =/= Input' raises |
| 1849 |
|
%% `error({invalid_custom_rule, ...})' |
| 1850 |
|
%% - `{normalized, Output}' maps to |
| 1851 |
|
%% `{normalized, Output, {invalid, Name, Input}}' |
| 1852 |
|
%% - `reject' maps to `{reject, {invalid, Name, Input}}' |
| 1853 |
|
%% - `{normalized, Output, Reason}' and `{reject, Reason}' |
| 1854 |
|
%% pass through unchanged |
| 1855 |
|
%% |
| 1856 |
|
%% Custom reasons are expected to use `{custom, term()}' so they do |
| 1857 |
|
%% not conflict with reasons from builtin rules. |
| 1858 |
|
%% |
| 1859 |
|
%% Examples: |
| 1860 |
|
%% ``` |
| 1861 |
|
%% 1> klsn_rule:eval(<<"10">>, integer, #{}). |
| 1862 |
|
%% {normalized,10,{invalid,integer,<<"10">>}} |
| 1863 |
|
%% 2> Unwrap = fun({ok, V}, _Param, _State) -> |
| 1864 |
|
%% {normalized, V, {custom, unwrapped}}; |
| 1865 |
|
%% (_, _Param, _State) -> |
| 1866 |
|
%% {reject, {custom, unexpected}} |
| 1867 |
|
%% end. |
| 1868 |
|
%% 3> Rule = {custom, unwrap_ok, Unwrap, []}. |
| 1869 |
|
%% 4> klsn_rule:eval({ok, 5}, Rule, #{}). |
| 1870 |
|
%% {normalized,5,{custom,unwrapped}} |
| 1871 |
|
%% 5> klsn_rule:eval(error, Rule, #{}). |
| 1872 |
|
%% {reject,{custom,unexpected}} |
| 1873 |
|
%% ''' |
| 1874 |
|
%% @see validate/2 |
| 1875 |
|
%% @see normalize/2 |
| 1876 |
|
-spec eval(input(), rule(), state()) -> strict_result(). |
| 1877 |
|
eval(Input, {custom, Name, Custom, Param}=Arg2, State) -> |
| 1878 |
1565404 |
case Custom(Input, Param, State) of |
| 1879 |
|
valid -> |
| 1880 |
238661 |
{valid, Input}; |
| 1881 |
|
{valid, Input} -> |
| 1882 |
96965 |
{valid, Input}; |
| 1883 |
|
{valid, Modified} -> |
| 1884 |
1 |
error({invalid_custom_rule, klsn_binstr:from_any(io_lib:format( |
| 1885 |
|
"custom rule ~p returned {valid, Output}=~p for input ~p, but Output /= Input. " |
| 1886 |
|
"{valid, output()} must return the unmodified input (or return valid)." |
| 1887 |
|
, [Name, Modified, Input] |
| 1888 |
|
))}, [Arg2, Input]); |
| 1889 |
|
{normalized, Output} -> |
| 1890 |
19050 |
{normalized, Output, {invalid, Name, Input}}; |
| 1891 |
|
{normalized, Output, Reason} -> |
| 1892 |
87365 |
{normalized, Output, Reason}; |
| 1893 |
|
reject -> |
| 1894 |
29675 |
{reject, {invalid, Name, Input}}; |
| 1895 |
|
{reject, Reason} -> |
| 1896 |
1093686 |
{reject, Reason}; |
| 1897 |
|
Unexpected -> |
| 1898 |
1 |
error({invalid_custom_rule, klsn_binstr:from_any(io_lib:format( |
| 1899 |
|
"custom rule ~p returned ~p when input is ~p. klsn_rule:result() expected." |
| 1900 |
|
, [Name, Unexpected, Input] |
| 1901 |
|
))}, [Arg2, Input]) |
| 1902 |
|
end; |
| 1903 |
|
eval(Input, Rule, State) -> |
| 1904 |
1565378 |
case rule_to_custom_(Rule) of |
| 1905 |
|
{value, CustomRule} -> |
| 1906 |
1565377 |
eval(Input, CustomRule, State); |
| 1907 |
|
none -> |
| 1908 |
1 |
{reject, {unknown_rule, Rule}} |
| 1909 |
|
end. |
| 1910 |
|
|
| 1911 |
|
|
| 1912 |
|
-spec rule_to_custom_(rule()) -> klsn:optnl({custom, name(), custom(), rule_param()}). |
| 1913 |
|
rule_to_custom_({custom, Name, Custom, Param}) -> |
| 1914 |
:-( |
{value, {custom, Name, Custom, Param}}; |
| 1915 |
|
rule_to_custom_(Rule) -> |
| 1916 |
1565378 |
{Name, Param} = case Rule of |
| 1917 |
|
{_, _} -> |
| 1918 |
1461381 |
Rule; |
| 1919 |
|
Name0 -> |
| 1920 |
103997 |
{Name0, []} |
| 1921 |
|
end, |
| 1922 |
1565378 |
MaybeRule = lists:search(fun |
| 1923 |
|
({FunName, 3})-> |
| 1924 |
23138925 |
try |
| 1925 |
23138925 |
<<(klsn_binstr:from_any(Name))/binary, "_rule">> =:= klsn_binstr:from_any(FunName) |
| 1926 |
|
catch _:_ -> |
| 1927 |
:-( |
false |
| 1928 |
|
end; |
| 1929 |
|
(_) -> |
| 1930 |
4696136 |
false |
| 1931 |
|
end, ?MODULE:module_info(exports)), |
| 1932 |
1565378 |
case MaybeRule of |
| 1933 |
|
{value, {Function, Arity}} -> |
| 1934 |
1565377 |
{value, {custom, Name, fun ?MODULE:Function/Arity, Param}}; |
| 1935 |
|
_ -> |
| 1936 |
1 |
none |
| 1937 |
|
end. |